Sermon, ‘Testing, Testing …’ (John 6:1-21)

Here is tomorrow’s sermon. The relevant Bible passage is here.

Introduction
On Friday we were in Lewes to bury my father-in-law’s ashes,
following his
death in February
. It was an unusual service for me to take – the family
had asked me to dress informally. So it was the first time I have officiated in
a cemetery wearing a polo shirt, chinos and trainers.

After the ceremony we
decamped to his favourite pub for
lunch. Over lunch I was sitting with Debbie’s nephews. One of them,
sixteen-year-old Ashley, is not enjoying this summer. And it’s not the heat.
It’s the wait until 24th August for his GCSE results. He hopes to go
on to A-Levels. He can’t yet think about whether he might get to university.
His mother is rather more sure of his abilities than he is. The results of his
testing will soon be with him. And with it the next stage of his life.

Likewise, one of the
things that scares me as a parent not of teenagers but small children is just
how young the testing starts, with SATs kicking in at age seven. Our children
are now the political footballs of power-hungry Government ministers. And they
will feel like they can never get away from being tested.

Testing, then, is my theme
this morning. It is a test for me, John’s account of the feeding of the five
thousand falling in this week’s Lectionary after I preached [an old sermon]
on Mark’s account last Sunday night!

But seriously, the testing
centres on Jesus. He tests the disciples, and the crowd implicitly tests him.
As we reflect on this story, I hope we can gain insight for some of the tests
and trials we undergo. And I hope we can also pay attention to some of the ways
we find ourselves testing Jesus – sometimes unwittingly.

1. Jesus Tests The Disciples
This is one of those
stories where the reader is in on the secret that some of the characters don’t
know. Jesus asks Philip,

‘Where
are we to buy bread for these people to eat?’
[verse 5]

Philip says that even six
months’ wages would not be enough money to pay for the amount of food needed
[verse 7] and Andrew says,

‘There
is a boy here who has five barley loaves and two fish. But what are they among
so many people?’
[verse 9]

Philip and Andrew feel
hopeless and helpless. But they don’t know the secret that John has let us in
on:

[Jesus]
said this to test [Philip], for he himself knew what he was going to do.
[verse 6]

Have you ever been in that
situation? Not, perhaps, having to feed five thousand men, plus women and
children with five barley loaves (the bread that the poorest of the poor ate)
and two fishes. But you may have felt that you were up against the impossible
and wondered what God was up to.

The most spectacular time
for me was in 1986 when I was about to leave work and study Theology. This was
before I offered for the ministry. In fact I thought God was calling me to
something and the last thing it could be was ordained ministry.

I accepted a place at Trinity College, Bristol. This being
the days before student loans, I applied for a grant. On the day before I was
due to leave for a summer holiday I learned that I had been turned down. I
authorised my parents to make an appeal in my absence and to contact other
people for help. I told the college my predicament. They said, “We need you to
guarantee us the first year’s fees,” and set me a deadline in August.

Two days before that
deadline was due to expire, I got the result of my appeal. I had been turned
down. Forty-eight hours to go and no money – apart from my savings, and they
weren’t enough.

It was at this point that
I discovered, like Philip, Andrew and the others in today’s reading that Jesus
‘knew what he was going to do’ all along. My parents discovered a savings
account they had forgotten about and gave me the money. A student who had taken
a year out before college to earn money for a car gave that money to me
instead. Her boyfriend sent me some money, not knowing my situation. Two
elderly ladies in my home church gave me sizeable donations. One wrote in a
letter, “It seems that God has called you to trust him to supply your needs. He
will meet ours too.” Those words told me what a sacrifice her giving was.

These and other gifts came
in. By deadline day I had three quarters of the funds I needed. I rang the
college Vice-Principal and he agreed I could come. He promised help with
applying to charitable trusts when I arrived. However these proved to be trusts
that my parents had approached and I did not fit the criteria for any of them.

However God had other
ideas, anyway. A week or two later I was preaching one evening at another
church in my home circuit. Due to my experiences I decided to preach on ‘Give
us this day our daily bread’. In the sermon I simply recounted that God had
provided all I needed. I did not say that I was still short.

After the service a friend
invited me back to his flat for a coffee. There he recounted a story. He had
been intending to take three-week holiday to New Zealand to visit his aunt, but
his aunt had died and he didn’t feel like going any more. However he had
already changed his pounds sterling into New Zealand dollars. But since
doing so the dollar had been devalued. He had held onto the money in the hope
that the dollar’s value would increase again. However it continued to fall on
the currency markets and his money was worth less and less. The money had become
an annoyance. Would I like to take this annoyance off his hands?

Before I could answer he
had left the living room, gone to his bedroom, and come back with some plastic Thomas Cook envelopes bulging with notes.
He threw them into my lap. To this day I can recall the exact amount: two
thousand, three hundred and ten New
Zealand dollars.

At the time my father was
working for NatWest and he got a staff
rate of exchange on the money. Again, I can remember the precise amount: seven
hundred and forty-two pounds, thirty-one pence. We calculated that my friend
had originally exchanged one thousand pounds for spending money. (And remember
this was twenty years ago.)

Later a friend at church
who was a Barclays Bank manager set up
a fund so that anyone who wanted to give towards my support could do so
anonymously. Since I was also turned down for a grant for my second year and
got just one third of a full grant for my third year, this giving – along with
some other gifts – bridged the gap.

As I said, that whole
story happened twenty years ago. I haven’t known anything quite so spectacular
in my own life since, although there have been some less dramatic examples of
the same truth. I was in a situation where I did not have what was needed. Yet
I was called to go to college. But Jesus knew what he was going to do.

So let me tell this story
as an encouragement and a challenge. Is there some similar situation in your
life? Might it be in our church’s life? Could it be in your family, or at work?
Something where you see a need – for yourself or others – and do not have the
wherewithal to meet it. Yet despite your lack God is not letting you off the
hook. It is time to press forward. Jesus knows what he is going to do.

2. The Crowd Tests Jesus
John tells us that ‘the
Passover, the festival of the Jews, was near’ [verse 4]. Is that just
incidental detail to the story? No. Colin Kruse explains:

‘Passover
was a time when Jewish people recalled their deliverance from Egypt through
Moses and were looking for the Prophet like him who was to come. They expected
the Prophet to bring deliverance and provide ‘manna’ from heaven as Moses had
done (cf. 2 Baruch 29:3 – 30:1). It
was a time when nationalistic fervour was high.’
[Colin Kruse, John, Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, p
161.]

Now imagine the crowd of
thousands watching Jesus feed them with just five barley loaves and two fish.
Why, here is the man. The ancient story of the manna has been handed down to
us. Now, look at what we are witnessing! This must be the prophet whom Moses
told us to wait for. And we too are in slavery. We might be living in our own
land but under these wretched Romans we might just as well be back in exile in Babylon or in slavery in Egypt. And he has performed this
sign at Passover, the feast of deliverance. What else could it mean?

Hence verse 14:

When
the people saw the sign that he had done, they began to say, ‘This is indeed
the prophet who is to come into the world.’

Their limited assumptions
then become a straitjacket, for then we read in verse 15,

When
Jesus realized that they were about to come and take him by force to make him
king, he withdrew again to the mountain by himself.

It’s that detail: they
wanted to take him by force. Oh,
Jesus was ‘the Prophet’ all right. He was king, too. But force was the very
opposite value of Jesus’ kingship. His is a kingdom of peace and
reconciliation, a kingdom where deliverance is brought not through war but
suffering. So he resists and escapes the pressing of the crowd, at least
temporarily.

Of course we don’t
straitjacket Jesus, do we? We might not want to wage war like downtrodden Jews
in the first century AD, but we might want to express our faith in unduly
militant ways in our culture at times.

Or we might want to impose
other expectations upon Jesus. Prayer becomes less a request and more an order.
Or it becomes the application of a formula and we expect him to deliver.
Perhaps most worryingly we bring the consumerism of our society into the
spiritual life. We are the customers and we are always right.

Now many of you will
protest that generally we don’t do that to Jesus. We have learned over many
years of Christian experience not to be so juvenile. Maybe so. But it comes out
in other forms, not always directly at Jesus but often at his Body, the Church.
So when the Church of Jesus Christ doesn’t supply what I demand it does, I
write a letter of complaint and I may well take my spiritual business
elsewhere.

I am not denying that
there are times when it would be right to leave a church for another one. And I
am not saying that we should accept any old rubbish in church life, either. But
I am saying we have got the spiritual life entirely wrong when we have
converted it to a list of our own demands. If we think we have the right to
test Jesus then we have got the relationship upside-down. If he is Lord (and
that is the basic Christian confession) then it is not whether he meets our expectations, it is whether we meet his. Of course, we don’t meet his
expectations, and that is where we experience the miracle of grace.

All of which means we need
to be gracious ourselves. For believe me, I have lived with hurt and disappointment
in the Christian Church long enough. But there is no Plan B with Jesus. We are
the Church of Jesus Christ – Jesus who is Lord and who
owns the Church, not us. We are a company of sinners who have been found by
grace. It is not for us to do the testing but for Jesus to test us graciously
with five loaves and two fish for the crowd so that our faith in him may grow.

 

Technorati Tags: , ,

6 thoughts on “Sermon, ‘Testing, Testing …’ (John 6:1-21)

Add yours

  1. The stories of the disciples are literary devices, intended to make the reader think he knows more than people who were given the power to raise the dead (Matthew 10) , and given the secret of the Kingdom of God (Mark 4)

    In the same way, the miracle stories of Jesus are literary creations, plagiarised from the miracle stories in the Greek translation of the Old Testament.

    This can be detected as easily as we can detect that some A-level students have copied their coursework from the Internet.

    Whole sentences are copied out. For example, when the author of Luke rewrites the story in 1 Kings 17 of Elijah raising the son of a widow he met at the gate of a city , to become a story of Jesus raising the son of a widow he met at the gate of a city, Luke copies out ‘kai edoken auton te metri autou’ from the old story.

    Luke also copies other phrases from the Elijah story when writing his story about Jesus.

    In 2 Kings 4:42-44, Elisha has a great many people to feed with only a few loaves of barley bread and a little other food. He delegates the task of feeding.

    There is a complaint that the quantity is too small. The feeding continues and everyone is fed. There is surplus bread left over. This older story from Kings has exactly the same plot as the feeding of the 5,000 – only the numbers are different.

    More plagiarism of the Old Testament miracle stories can also be found in other stories about Jesus.

    The stories are not historical. They are not even original to Jesus.

    There are more details at

    Like

  2. Steven,

    Firstly your argument for literary creations is a poor one. Language enters the culture and gets used naturally, just as we find ourselves quoting Shakespeare without knowing it. It would in any case be natural to lift the religious language to describe these new events. And I had read the 2 Kings passage before preparing the sermon, since it was the Old Testament reading in yesterday’s Lectionary.

    Secondly your reply to Pam seems to expose your attitude. When you first commented on this blog the other day I have to admit I was suspicious of your tone but I thought I would give you the benefit of the doubt. I am happy for this blog to be a place of discussion and debate. But to say, ‘I feel it is my duty to educate Christians in their religion’ smacks of arrogance, not least to someone like myself who has studied Theology to postgraduate level under a variety of scholars. Comment here in an eirenic way and I’m happy to approve your comments; comment arrogantly and I will delete them.

    I have looked at your blog and your other website and read some of the stuff, especially the story of your ‘deconversion’. Some of us who have remained within the faith have done so after struggling with doubts and we still have unanswered questions. We haven’t all had the same life journey as you and haven’t reached the same conclusions. There are problems with believing in God and there are problems with not doing so. You may disagree with us – fair enough – but don’t give me this patronising talk of ‘educating Christians’.

    Like

  3. I feel it is my duty to educate Christians in their religion.

    Hmm, in the case of this comment, I don’t think you’ve said anything particularly earth-shattering and nothing that anyone with a basic course in biblical criticism doesn’t know – albeit with an atheistic spin. And, to me, your comments don’t seem particularly pertinent to the sermon; you appear to have totally missed the narrative spirit in which the sermon was given.

    Atheism / belief, IMO, is a question of epistemology, not necessarily of faith or doctrine. Personally, I don’t see much mileage in trying to convert someone to either atheism or belief, but whatever floats your boat.

    Secondly your reply to Pam seems to expose your attitude.

    I’ve always rather thought that Steven had a good sense of humour for a crusading atheist.

    Like

  4. Yes, it was very natural for the NT writers to use the LXX for stories about Jesus, just as it was natural for Muhammad and Joseph Smith to recycle old stories when they were writing their Holy Books.

    The fact that it was natural to copy is not a defense – no more than it is natural for A-level students to copy internet essays and pass them off as their own.

    Very similar plots , very similar wording. An open-and-shut case.

    What deconversion story did you read on mmy blog? I have never posted one. Can you give me a quote from it please?

    Like

  5. Steven,

    Similar plots and wording do not necessarily mean plagiarism. An example from a different field: George Harrison was held to have committed unintentional plagiarism of The Chiffons’ ‘He’s So Fine’ when he wrote ‘My Sweet Lord’. But it was unintentional and Harrison was trying to say something about his beliefs in that song. He had not deliberately plagiarised, but the links were there. I think you’re imputing a motive to the Gospel writers, and my personal opinion is that it is an unfair imputation you are making.

    As to your deconversion story, I said I had read pieces on both your blog and your website. The deconversion story was on your website. You referred me to your website in your first comment on this post. (However for some reason Typepad stripped out the URL.) I am referring to your bowness.demon.co.uk site. I also Googled you and came to that site.

    And having said that, I am going to call a halt to this discussion at this point. I have spent far too much time arguing this in the last few days and while I want to promote good discussion and debate I need to get back to other matters that also rightly demand my time as well as running this blog.

    For readers who are interested in pursuing more of Steven’s views I have mentioned his website above, and his blog is at stevencarrwork.blogspot.com

    Like

Leave a reply to Pam Cancel reply

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑