The Fourfold Action of the Covenant Meal (Covenant Service Sermon, January 2026)

Mark 14:22-25

Worship: Last Supper Celebration of Holy Communion. Public Domain from PickPik.

In a book called ‘Liturgy and Liberty’, an Anglican priest named John Leach tells a lovely story about coming in to find his children having lined up all their cuddly toys. Asking what they are doing, they reply that they are ‘Playing Communions.’ And they move from cuddly toy to cuddly toy, giving each some bread, with the words, ‘A piece of the Lord.’

Now you may say that this is an example of children not understanding Holy Communion, confusing ‘The peace of the Lord’ with the giving of the bread. But of course, the rejoinder is surely that many adult Christians also do not understand what is happening at the sacrament.

And where better to reflect on the meaning of the Lord’s Supper than at the Covenant Service? For Holy Communion is the Covenant Meal. As ancient covenants were sealed with blood, so God’s covenant with us in Christ is sealed in his blood, and we remember that at the Lord’s Table.

That said, I am not going to discuss theories of what does or doesn’t happen the bread and wine. I could do that one day, although I’d have to be careful that I was still preaching a sermon and not just giving you a theological lecture. I am content with the broad Methodist position that Christ is present at the sacrament, but exactly how he is present is a mystery that resists definition.

What I want to do instead today is consider what God does with us when we receive the bread and wine. I am following a pattern suggested by the late Catholic priest Henri Nouwen. Listen to the four things Jesus does with the bread at the Last Supper in verse 22:

While they were eating, Jesus took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to his disciples, saying, ‘Take it; this is my body.’

Took. Gave thanks. Broke. Gave. Go back to ancient communion liturgies and they make those four actions central to their structure. We do it, too. The minister takes the bread and prepares it for use. Then we give thanks. The bread is broken, and finally it is given. In 1945, an Anglican Benedictine monk, Gregory Dix, said this was the fundamental shape that mattered, and this is why a lot of modern communion services of different denominations look similar, even if the words vary.

Henri Nouwen took this one step further. He said that what Jesus did with the bread is what he also does with us. Let’s see what that means for us.

Firstly, as Jesus takes the bread, so he also takes us:

The bread is taken and prepared for holy use. It is set apart for its special purpose in the sacrament.

We too are taken and set aside by God for his special, holy purposes. We are not merely forgiven and given a ticket to heaven that we cash in when we die. We have been chosen and brought into the family of God so that we may play our part in the work of his kingdom.

Each Christian has a calling. Sometimes it involves laying down what we are doing to take on something else, just as Jesus called the fishermen, who left their nets to become disciples and then apostles. For others, the special purpose simply involves living for Christ in the place where he found us in the first place. In 1 Corinthians 7:20 Paul says this:

Each person should remain in the situation they were in when God called them.

If there is no specific call to move to something else, then we recognise that God in Christ has called us to be content where we are, and faithfully serve him in that place and those circumstances.

But let there be no doubt either way that God has set us aside to be his holy people. That’s what holiness is – to be set apart. A certain distinctive lifestyle flows from that, but the essence of holiness is to be set apart for God’s purposes. It is not unique to those ordained by the church, it is what God does with every single one of his disciples.

Secondly, as Jesus thanks God for the bread, so he also thanks God for us:

This is the one where I find most people struggle. How can Jesus thank God for me? I’m a sinner. He knows that! I’m weak and frail. He knows that, too! We come up with a whole series of ‘But’s to object to this idea of Jesus giving thanks to God for us. But, but, but.

But nothing. We thank God for other people. We thank God for other objects, just as Jesus thanks God for the bread. There is nothing impossible here.

Yes, God cares about our sin, and he disciplines us and forgives us, but none of that is about having a grudging attitude to us. It is about the love of a Father who longs for the best in his children. If I may so reverently, God is crazy about us. Think of the father running to meet the Prodigal Son. That just wasn’t done in those days. Any other father would have waited at home for the errant son to return, grovelling. But God the Father runs to meet his children.

The prophet Zephaniah puts it this way:

The Lord your God is with you,
    the Mighty Warrior who saves.
He will take great delight in you;
    in his love he will no longer rebuke you,
    but will rejoice over you with singing.’

(Zephaniah 3:17)

I saw a cartoon over Christmas which claimed to depict ‘Calvinist Santa’, where everyone was on Santa’s naughty list. And while it’s true that we are all sinners in need of salvation, if we just imagine God like Calvinist Santa as some mean, stern, miserable character, we shall have missed the truth that God rejoices over us and lets the angels throw parties for us in heaven. And it is this God, not Calvinist Santa, that we come to, even at such as solemn service as the Covenant Service.

Thirdly, as Jesus breaks the bread, so he also breaks us:

OK, here’s the tough, painful stuff. Is that what you’re thinking? Jesus has to break the bread to distribute it. And to get the Body of Christ where he wants it, he has to separate us.

But he also uses our brokenness for good. As Charles Haddon Spurgeon said,

God gets His best soldiers out of the highlands of affliction.

We resist brokenness. We think we must have our act together – or at least a public face that suggests that. We hide our brokenness for fear of shame or rejection.

But God doesn’t reject us for it. He can take our brokenness and deploy it for good. Like the risen body of Jesus still showing the marks of the nails from the crucifixion, God works with our brokenness a little like the Japanese art of Kintsugi, where broken fragments are restored with gold, silver, or platinum and shine more beautifully than they did before.

In his song ‘Anthem’, the late Canadian singer Leonard Cohen has these words:

Ring the bells that still can ring
Forget your perfect offering
There is a crack a crack in everything
That’s how the light gets in

You’ve heard me talk about some of my experiences of brokenness. The lung surgery in my twenties, the broken engagement, walking with my father’s Alzheimer’s, and the depression. I wish every single one of those things had not happened. I would prefer the ‘magic wand’ God many people wish for, who would instantly remove these things. But usually when I talk about them, people come up to me afterwards and say, ‘You might understand what I’m going through. Can we talk?’

There is a crack in everything. That’s how the light gets in. This year, let us allow God to work for good through our brokenness.

Fourthly and finally, as Jesus gives the bread, so he also gives us:

The bread is a gift of God to us. It is not something we give to him, and that’s why I don’t have the bread and wine brought up to the table with the offering. Jesus offered his body and blood for us, and the bread and wine are analogous to that. The bread is therefore his gift to us and to the world.

And it follows that we too are a gift from Jesus to others.

Again, you may resist that thought. How can I be a gift of God to others? Who would want me?

Yet this says more about our low estimation of ourselves than it does about God’s love for us. God only gives good gifts. He loves us so much that he gives us to others.

Somewhere in our circle of contacts, there is a person who needs us if they are to be blessed according to God’s kingdom purposes. Joining in the Covenant Prayer today is about us assenting to those good plans God has for us to bless others with his love. It is our version of standing with Isaiah, who encountered God in his holy glory in the Jerusalem Temple, and heard him say, ‘Who will go for us?’, and responded, ‘Here I am, send me.’

It is more blessed to give than receive, said Jesus. But today, the giving is not only about our money, our time, our talents, or our possessions. It is about God’s desire to give us to others in the cause of holy blessing.

Many of us here are, or have been, married. We have taken that step of giving ourselves wholeheartedly to another human being in love. At the Covenant Service, God in Christ calls us to co-operate with another act of total self-giving in love. Because in his love and by the power of his Spirit, we are a valuable gift to others in his cause.

We have just celebrated the fact that God gave us the gift of his Son. Let us respond by being available as a gift to be given to others.

Sermon: The Identity Of Jesus And His Disciples

Mark 8:27-38

Just the other day I came across a spoof news report from two years ago which claimed that the then Home Secretary Jacqui Smith wanted people to use their loyalty cards more, and for stores which didn’t have them to introduce them. This was to combat terrorism, in the light of the Glasgow bombers having bought their supplies from B & Q, which didn’t at the time have a loyalty card. According to the article, she wanted loyalty cards to replace the unpopular idea of identity cards, and for the data collected by loyalty cards to be used in intelligence gathering operations. In the article, these words are put into Jacqui Smith’s mouth:

“The plan is not just for the ID cards, but to outsource the whole of MI5 to Tesco,” said the Home Secretary. “Frankly they seem to know more about what people in this country are doing than we do.”

Identity. It’s a big theme today. Identity cards and identity theft are but two major areas of concern and controversy about the identity of individuals in our society.

And identity is a central theme of our Gospel reading. It’s about the identity of Jesus, and the consequent identity of his disciples. I see this revelation of identity coming in three phases.

Firstly, we have a confession.

If you like reading stories, I wonder what kinds you prefer. Thrillers, romance, epics? If you enjoy whodunits or mysteries, you will be somewhat disappointed by Mark’s Gospel. In the very first verse, he tells us it is the Gospel of Jesus the Christ, the Son of God. Jesus is both the Christ (or Messiah) and the Son of God. At the Cross, the Roman centurion confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, and here, Peter says ‘You are the Messiah’ (verse 29), when Jesus asks the disciples who they think he is, as opposed to the opinions of people they know.

This, then, is one of the high water marks of Mark’s Gospel. Here, after all the build-up, with Jesus’ popularity among ordinary people and the opposition starting to rise from those who feel threatened by him, is a decisive confession by Peter. ‘You are the Messiah.’ Lesser options, like the ones proposed by others, will not do. Jesus is more than ‘John the Baptist; and others, Elijah; and still others, one of the prophets’ (verse 28).

And it’s similar today. Lesser confessions will not do. Around the time I first became seriously interested in faith for myself, musicals like Godspell and Jesus Christ Superstar had been popular. Both contain elements that are worthy of appreciation by Christians, and it’s interesting to see how people without a clear Christian faith perceive Jesus, but both fall short. Godspell is ambivalent about the Resurrection. Jesus is dead at the end, and you simply have the ambiguous song ‘Long live God.’ And Jesus Christ is more than a superstar. Indeed, his whole approach to life would critique attitudes to stardom and popularity.

Do we run the danger of making a lesser confession in the Church sometimes? Possibly. Might liberal Christians be so enamoured by the social justice implications of Jesus’ teachings that they forget the importance of salvation from our own sins? Might catholic Christians be so entranced by the power of the sacraments in remembering Jesus that they overlook the personal responsibility we have in embracing faith? Might evangelical Christians be so caught up with the personal blessings of salvation that they pass over the social implications of his message and ministry?

These are all over-simplifications, I know, but I hope I make this simple point. Encounter with Jesus leads to a full-blooded confession of him as Messiah. It involves the blessings of forgiveness, new life and salvation for us. It starts with God’s initiative towards us, and we need to respond. And it isn’t merely for our own benefit, but for sake of God’s love for the world. All these things are implied in confessing Jesus as Messiah.

So let’s make sure our confession of Jesus is not a truncated one, not restricted by the vision of the world or by our church tradition. Let’s accept that confessing Jesus as Messiah leads us to a big, inspiring vision of who he is, what he does, who he blesses and what he calls us to do.

Secondly, there is confusion. Early in my ministry, I asked a congregation how they might have imagined their new minister before I arrived. Perhaps I was married with children, with brown eyes and right-handed. At the time, I was single (without children!). My eyes are blue (please don’t say ‘red’ after the service!) and I’ve always been part of that elite minority of people who are left-handed.

Similarly, when I moved from that appointment, I obtained a profile from one circuit I was interested in, only to find buried in it a description of their ideal minister as being married with children. At the time, I was still single (and still without children!). I found it sobering to talk the other morning with our Chair of District about our move from this circuit when she said I would be a more attractive option to some circuits because I was married with kids.

People can imagine all they like what someone is like, only for reality to deal a shock to them. that’s certainly what happened to Peter when Jesus explained that as Messiah he would have to suffer and die (verse 31). You’ll remember that Peter was shocked and began to rebuke Jesus (verse 32), only to earn the response

‘Get behind me, Satan! For you are setting your mind not on divine things but on human things.’ (Verse 33)

Peter’s fantasies about the Messiah have to be exploded. No warmongering conqueror of the Roman occupying forces, but the suffering conqueror of occupying sin. We think of other Gospel stories, like James and John getting mad when a village doesn’t respond to the message of Jesus. They ask him whether calling down fire from heaven would be a good response, and Jesus declines their suggestion. No wonder they were nicknamed the Sons of Thunder.

All this is obvious to us with hindsight. We know that Jesus came as a suffering Messiah, not a military general or a freedom fighter. We know the way of the Messiah is the journey to the Cross. So you might think it would be easy for us to live without the confusion of Peter and the first disciples.

I am not so sure. We may know in our heads that the path of Jesus would take him to Calvary, but there are times when we want to call on a warlike Messiah, just like his first followers. Think about how we pray sometimes about evil. We may want God to sort it with a quick fix. We may ask God to zap evildoers, whether they are tyrants inflicting injustice on their people or folk we know who have treated us unfairly or even cruelly.

I wonder whether those are the kinds of prayers to which God answers, ‘No.’ I wonder whether heaven even says, ‘Get behind me, Satan’ to us when we pray like that. I wonder whether the way we need guiding out of our confusion about Jesus is to focus our thoughts and devotions much more solidly on the Cross. Having seen some churches ripped apart by bitterness and lack of forgiveness, I do suspect we have our fair share of Peters and Sons of Thunder in today’s church. But here, especially, and as always, the Cross is what unscrambles our confusion about Jesus.

Thirdly and finally, this passage presents us with a challenge. Many of us may find the world of the prosperity gospel preachers baffling and bizarre. If you’ve caught sight of any on satellite TV, you’ll know what I mean.

But it’s easy to understand their appeal. ‘God wants you rich’ is an attractive message in a materialistic society. ‘Jesus suffered so that you don’t have to’ plays well in a culture that spends all its time trying to avoid suffering. And while we might see through the ‘God wants you rich’ approach, I think a lot of us don’t so much think about suffering as attempt to avoid it.

But think about it we must, because the challenge of Jesus here is that just as he was to go to the Cross, so too his followers would have to face suffering because they are his disciples. ‘If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me,’ he says (verse 34).

It’s not that Jesus thinks we should go looking for suffering, but he calls us all to such an abandonment to his ways that it will bring us in the firing line of evil, just as happened to him. If that happens, then self-preservation is not an option. If I want to save my life, I will lose it, but if I surrender it for Jesus and the Gospel I will save it (verse 35).

Now that thought is one we need to apply not only to ourselves as individuals, but also to churches. How often I hear churches in these days of aging and declining congregations talk about how they are going to survive and keep open. ‘How are we going to keep our church going?’ people ask. I suggest that it is a question based on self-preservation rather than a concern for the Gospel. It’s about how we are going to save our lives, rather than a passion for other people to know the love of God in Christ. Maybe churches that talk like that are the very ones that will lose their lives.

Few people like the idea of embracing suffering head on – I certainly don’t! However, we need to remember that Jesus offers us hope with these challenging words: if we are willing to lose our lives for his sake, we will save our lives. That might be in this life, it might be in the life of the world to come. But Jesus keeps his promises. I recently read this story:

Bernard Gilpin (1517-1583) was a preacher who was taken into custody for preaching the gospel during the time when Queen Mary Tudor was persecuting Protestants. He was being taken to London to certain death, but to the amusement of the guards accompanying him he kept saying, ‘Everything is for the best.’ On the way he fell off his horse and was hurt, so they could not travel for a few days. He told the amused guards, ‘I have no doubt that even this painful accident will prove to be a blessing.’ Finally he was able to resume his journey. As they were nearing London, later than expected, they heard the church bells ringing. They asked someone why this was so. They were told, ‘Queen Mary is dead, and there will be no more burning of Protestants.’ Gilpin looked at the guards and said, ‘Ah, you see, it is all for the best.’[1]

So let us embrace the challenge, knowing Jesus will give us life everlasting, whatever we lay down now.


[1] Ajith Fernando, The Call to Joy and Pain, p36, citing Tom Carter (editor), Spurgeon at his Best, pp323ff.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑