A Little Remembrance Sunday Controversy

Well, this morning’s sermon greatly upset two women in the congregation of the parish church for our united service. It was my reference to the mailshot from Boots, about which I previously blogged. A number of things offended them, and they told me after a post-service ceremony at the war graves that I had ruined the service for them.

Firstly they accused me of putting in this example without thinking. (How they knew my thought processes was beyond me.) I replied that it was my Christian duty as a minister to name wrong when I witnessed it. I stand by that, and all the more so, having quoted Martin Luther King at length in the sermon.

Secondly, they said, I should not have picked on Boots, when all the other major stores did the same. I replied that I had previously spoken out against other companies (for example, see this 2003 newspaper piece about Marks and Spencer; when I preached about that at an ecumenical church, an M & S pensioner flew into a rage at the rector about me – she never spoke to me). Boots were just this year’s example.

Thirdly, they were furious because their Boots store did a lot for charity. Currently they have a lot of merchandise for the BBC Children In Need appeal. Maybe so, but I still reserve the right to speak out against sin. My children are wonderful most of the time, but that hardly means I should overlook their misdeeds. It reminded me of a time many years ago when I condemned Freemasonry in a sermon, not knowing that a church member was a mason. He too was furious with me, especially because the masons did substantial charitable work, including in the majority world. But that didn’t mean I stopped regarding Freemasonry as spiritual poison. This objection seems to be based on the heresy that if our good works outweigh our bad ones, we’ll be OK with God. This above all suggested to me that there was little acquaintance here with the need for divine grace.

Fourthly, they said that if I felt this way I should return my ‘Advantage Card’ (Boots’ loyalty card). This criticism had the most weight, I felt. I said I would certainly consider that. Reflecting further I realise it’s not so easy to disentangle myself from the corporate globalised culture, much as I would like to. When I read a year or two ago Brian Walsh and Sylvia Keesmat’s incredible book Colossians Remixed I was struck by an early statement in the book about how they managed to get all their groceries from a small co-operative shop. Unfortunately we find it less easy to obtain all our needs that way. Nevertheless I did resolve later not to do more Christmas shopping than absolutely necessary at Boots as my own small protest.

I would further observe that the company loyalty of these two women was both touching and frightening. I am sure Boots are pleased to have such loyal employees. But it seemed hugely ironic that at a Remembrance Sunday service where we thankfully had not sung the blasphemous hymn ‘I vow to thee my country’ (‘The love that asks no questions’, etc.) what I had heard outside in the church cemetery was ‘My company right or wrong’. Just as true patriotism reserves the right to criticise one’s nation out of love for it, so we need to be discerning about alll the employers and institutions that claim us.

For a few minutes after this verbal assault I wondered whether I needed to learn a lesson and be corrected. But having shared it with one or two and also given it some further reflection I have concluded that I had basically earned the women’s rebuke as a consequence of preaching something that was faithful to Christ and his Gospel. Of course I could be wrong …

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Tomorrow’s Remembrance Sunday Sermon: Greater Love

John 15:9-17

Introduction
Most preachers I’ve talked to dread preaching on Remembrance
Sunday. There are several reasons why.

One is that you can be sure the congregation will hold
diverse and contradictory views on war. There are those who expect you to
affirm the importance of standing up to evil in the world. There are others,
such as the man who once told me, ‘There is only one thing to say on
Remembrance Sunday and that is that war is futile.’

And that is a tension I hold in my own life. As a teenager I
was a committed pacifist. Eventually I changed my mind and saw that there was
such a thing as a just war. However even then I don’t know how easily I could
kill someone, which may just make me a hypocrite. And in any case, determining
what constitutes a just war is difficult. World War Two is more easy to
classify as a just war, at least in principle, than, say, the Iraq War, where
it was easier to win the war against an evil dictator than win the subsequent
peace.

Another issue is that of the experience of war. My
connections are tenuous. I come from an RAF family, and one of my cousins
served in the Falklands. My uncle was a career
Air Force man, and worked with Bomber Harris, but that was after World War Two.
My own father was not quite old enough to serve in that war when it ended. The
nearest I have come to any contact was pretty slender: in 1982 I went to the
Post Office to apply for a Visitor’s
Passport for a holiday, only to learn that men of my age then were not being
allowed to apply for them. Clearly we were being held in reserve for possible
call-up to serve in the Falklands War. But the call thankfully never came.

So my own experience is not of outright war, but
predominantly of peace-time. I only know the culture of living under the threat
of possible conflict, be it the Cold War that lasted until the late Eighties,
or the climate of terrorism, either the current one with radical Islam or the
earlier threat of the IRA. None of this is the same as that which many of you
lived through in the Second World War.

Then there is our text today: in my translation of the Bible
it says this:

No one has greater love than this, to
lay down one’s life for one’s friends.
(John 15:13)

I remember seeing it (in older language, of course) carved
into the stone on the War Memorial in my home town. And as a Christian, I have
some difficulty with its use on Remembrance Sunday, because it is primarily a
text about Jesus and his disciples, not about the sacrifices made in war-time.
But nevertheless I feel it does have something important to say to us today,
and so I want to turn to those words as a theme for this sermon. I want to do
so in two halves, firstly considering what the words meant for Jesus and secondly
what they mean for us as his followers.

1. Jesus
There is no doubt in my mind that when Jesus said, ‘No one
has greater love than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends’, he was
referring to his own then forthcoming death on the Cross. This is where he will
go. It will not be a tragic accident. It will not simply be the forces of
history. It will not be against Jesus’ will, he says that he will lay down his life. It is deliberate and
purposeful. It is his intention. It is not that he will risk his life and
perhaps he will die; Jesus will consciously lay down his life in love.

But how can laying down his life be of itself an act of
love? George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, once observed that a
young man does not show his love for a young woman by throwing himself off a
cliff. Laying down your life can only be a sign of love if it is done for a
particular purpose, if it is done to achieve something.

And this is where Christ laying down his life is a sign of
love. He demonstrates his Father’s love for the world by dying the death our
sins deserves in our place, so as to bring reconciliation. It is not that the
Father is angry with us and Jesus placates him but that they are in partnership
to bring sinful humanity back into the orbit of divine love.

But we do speak of Christ in his love taking the punishment
for our sins. We can do so because the Cross encapsulates both of the major
aspects of punishment. It is a matter of retribution in that it shows us our
wrongdoing and the unacceptable nature of it. The Cross does that, because it
shows us what our sin has done to God. And it is also a matter of reformation:
it is not enough to be punished; one has to learn to be better and different.
The Cross has great power for reforming people.

So Christ’s love in laying down his life for us is about
retribution and reformation. His death on the Cross shows us our sin, and in
doing so is meant to bring us to the point of saying, ‘O Lord, did I do that to
you? I want to turn away from such a way of life. Please forgive me.’ We then
find that because Christ in his love died in our place God does indeed forgive
us.

And the reforming intention of punishment is seen in
Christ’s loving death on the Cross, too. He loves us enough to die that we
might be forgiven. But he loves us too much just to leave us as forgiven
sinners. He wants to change us. And through the Cross and Resurrection Jesus
offers us not merely an example but the gift of his Spirit, who enables us to
live differently.

The death of Christ, then, is the supreme example in history
of someone laying down their life for others out of love. And it is a
sacrificial death to which we all need to respond. This is the great death to
win the war on evil. Christ absorbs and conquers evil, not by violence and
bombs, but by submitting to its worst and turning it around, much as a Judo
expert uses his opponent’s strength against him.

So when we think this Remembrance Sunday about the greater
love of laying down one’s life, let us respond to what Christ has done on the
Cross for us. Let us be deeply sobered by what the Cross tells us of our sins
and come in confession and repentance. But let us also come to the loving
Christ of the Cross to find power to live differently.

2. His Followers
Before Jesus makes his ‘greater love’ statement, he says
this to his disciples:

‘This is my commandment, that you love
one another as I have loved you.’
(John 15:12)

So if Jesus loves us in a sacrificial, laying down his life
way, he calls us to love in the same way. Contrast that with this
mailshot
I received last month from Boots:

Dear Reverend Faulkner,

There are so many things to enjoy over Christmas: the parties, the presents and
making yourself gorgeous for the big day itself. Well, we want to make sure
that you look and feel a million dollars as well as help you enjoy the season
for less. …

… Why not treat yourself to something gorgeous this Christmas? Go on, you
know you deserve it.

I hope you enjoy Christmas like never before!

Rebecca Pearson
Advantage Card Manager

Isn’t it just what you expect from a society that was
recently described as thinking that the meaning of life is just about getting yourself
one treat after another? Yet the call of Jesus is not to self-indulgence but to
sacrificial love, even to the point of losing one’s life.

It is something that has been demonstrated courageously time
and time again in all sorts of situations. In terms of wartime I am drawn to
the famous story of the Catholic priest Father Maximillian Kolbe who willingly
took the place of a frightened family man in a Nazi gas chamber. Many of you
will know other stories of sacrificial heroism that never made the headlines.

Outside wartime I have just been reading a summary of Martin
Luther King’s heroic stand against racism in 1960s America. It was his explicit choice
as a Christian to confront that evil in a non-violent way that led to certain
suffering.

As riots broke out in places like Los Angeles, Chicago and Harlem, King travelled from city to city trying to cool
tempers and reminding demonstrators that moral change is not accomplished
through immoral means. He had learned that principle from the Sermon on the Mount,
and almost all his speeches reiterated the message. ‘Christianity,’ he said,
‘has always insisted that the cross we bear precedes the crown we wear. To be a
Christian one must take up his cross, with all its difficulties and agonising
and tension-packed content, and carry it until that very cross leaves its mark
upon us and redeems us to that more excellent way which comes only through
suffering.’
(Philip Yancey, Soul Survivor: How My
Faith Survived The Church
, p 25)

Or hear him addressing weary marchers who had trudged from Selma, Montgomery,
to the state capitol:

I know that you are asking today, ‘How
long will it take?’ I come to say to you this afternoon, however difficult the
moment, however frustrating the hour, it will not be long, because truth
pressed to earth will rise again.

How long? Not long, because no lie can
live forever.

How long? Not long, because you will
reap what you sow.

How long? Not long, because the arm of
the moral universe is long but it bends towards justice.

How long? Not long, because ‘cause mine
eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord, trampling out the vintage
where the grapes of wrath are stored. He has loosed the fateful lightning of
his terrible swift sword. His truth is marching on.

He has sounded forth the trumpets that
shall never call retreat. He is lifting up the hearts of man before his
judgment seat. Oh, be swift my soul to answer him. Be jubilant, my feet. Our
God is marching on.
(ibid, p 29f)

Conclusion
No-one has greater love than Jesus who willingly died for
the sins of the world. Our response is to receive the forgiveness he offers
through it and be transformed into those who also will live risky sacrificial
lives for the sake of his kingdom. Can we show ‘greater love’?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Tomorrow’s Remembrance Sunday Sermon: Greater Love

John 15:9-17

Introduction
Most preachers I’ve talked to dread preaching on Remembrance
Sunday. There are several reasons why.

One is that you can be sure the congregation will hold
diverse and contradictory views on war. There are those who expect you to
affirm the importance of standing up to evil in the world. There are others,
such as the man who once told me, ‘There is only one thing to say on
Remembrance Sunday and that is that war is futile.’

And that is a tension I hold in my own life. As a teenager I
was a committed pacifist. Eventually I changed my mind and saw that there was
such a thing as a just war. However even then I don’t know how easily I could
kill someone, which may just make me a hypocrite. And in any case, determining
what constitutes a just war is difficult. World War Two is more easy to
classify as a just war, at least in principle, than, say, the Iraq War, where
it was easier to win the war against an evil dictator than win the subsequent
peace.

Another issue is that of the experience of war. My
connections are tenuous. I come from an RAF family, and one of my cousins
served in the Falklands. My uncle was a career
Air Force man, and worked with Bomber Harris, but that was after World War Two.
My own father was not quite old enough to serve in that war when it ended. The
nearest I have come to any contact was pretty slender: in 1982 I went to the
Post Office to apply for a Visitor’s
Passport for a holiday, only to learn that men of my age then were not being
allowed to apply for them. Clearly we were being held in reserve for possible
call-up to serve in the Falklands War. But the call thankfully never came.

So my own experience is not of outright war, but
predominantly of peace-time. I only know the culture of living under the threat
of possible conflict, be it the Cold War that lasted until the late Eighties,
or the climate of terrorism, either the current one with radical Islam or the
earlier threat of the IRA. None of this is the same as that which many of you
lived through in the Second World War.

Then there is our text today: in my translation of the Bible
it says this:

No one has greater love than this, to
lay down one’s life for one’s friends.
(John 15:13)

I remember seeing it (in older language, of course) carved
into the stone on the War Memorial in my home town. And as a Christian, I have
some difficulty with its use on Remembrance Sunday, because it is primarily a
text about Jesus and his disciples, not about the sacrifices made in war-time.
But nevertheless I feel it does have something important to say to us today,
and so I want to turn to those words as a theme for this sermon. I want to do
so in two halves, firstly considering what the words meant for Jesus and secondly
what they mean for us as his followers.

1. Jesus
There is no doubt in my mind that when Jesus said, ‘No one
has greater love than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends’, he was
referring to his own then forthcoming death on the Cross. This is where he will
go. It will not be a tragic accident. It will not simply be the forces of
history. It will not be against Jesus’ will, he says that he will lay down his life. It is deliberate and
purposeful. It is his intention. It is not that he will risk his life and
perhaps he will die; Jesus will consciously lay down his life in love.

But how can laying down his life be of itself an act of
love? George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, once observed that a
young man does not show his love for a young woman by throwing himself off a
cliff. Laying down your life can only be a sign of love if it is done for a
particular purpose, if it is done to achieve something.

And this is where Christ laying down his life is a sign of
love. He demonstrates his Father’s love for the world by dying the death our
sins deserves in our place, so as to bring reconciliation. It is not that the
Father is angry with us and Jesus placates him but that they are in partnership
to bring sinful humanity back into the orbit of divine love.

But we do speak of Christ in his love taking the punishment
for our sins. We can do so because the Cross encapsulates both of the major
aspects of punishment. It is a matter of retribution in that it shows us our
wrongdoing and the unacceptable nature of it. The Cross does that, because it
shows us what our sin has done to God. And it is also a matter of reformation:
it is not enough to be punished; one has to learn to be better and different.
The Cross has great power for reforming people.

So Christ’s love in laying down his life for us is about
retribution and reformation. His death on the Cross shows us our sin, and in
doing so is meant to bring us to the point of saying, ‘O Lord, did I do that to
you? I want to turn away from such a way of life. Please forgive me.’ We then
find that because Christ in his love died in our place God does indeed forgive
us.

And the reforming intention of punishment is seen in
Christ’s loving death on the Cross, too. He loves us enough to die that we
might be forgiven. But he loves us too much just to leave us as forgiven
sinners. He wants to change us. And through the Cross and Resurrection Jesus
offers us not merely an example but the gift of his Spirit, who enables us to
live differently.

The death of Christ, then, is the supreme example in history
of someone laying down their life for others out of love. And it is a
sacrificial death to which we all need to respond. This is the great death to
win the war on evil. Christ absorbs and conquers evil, not by violence and
bombs, but by submitting to its worst and turning it around, much as a Judo
expert uses his opponent’s strength against him.

So when we think this Remembrance Sunday about the greater
love of laying down one’s life, let us respond to what Christ has done on the
Cross for us. Let us be deeply sobered by what the Cross tells us of our sins
and come in confession and repentance. But let us also come to the loving
Christ of the Cross to find power to live differently.

2. His Followers
Before Jesus makes his ‘greater love’ statement, he says
this to his disciples:

‘This is my commandment, that you love
one another as I have loved you.’
(John 15:12)

So if Jesus loves us in a sacrificial, laying down his life
way, he calls us to love in the same way. Contrast that with this
mailshot
I received last month from Boots:

Dear Reverend Faulkner,

There are so many things to enjoy over Christmas: the parties, the presents and
making yourself gorgeous for the big day itself. Well, we want to make sure
that you look and feel a million dollars as well as help you enjoy the season
for less. …

… Why not treat yourself to something gorgeous this Christmas? Go on, you
know you deserve it.

I hope you enjoy Christmas like never before!

Rebecca Pearson
Advantage Card Manager

Isn’t it just what you expect from a society that was
recently described as thinking that the meaning of life is just about getting yourself
one treat after another? Yet the call of Jesus is not to self-indulgence but to
sacrificial love, even to the point of losing one’s life.

It is something that has been demonstrated courageously time
and time again in all sorts of situations. In terms of wartime I am drawn to
the famous story of the Catholic priest Father Maximillian Kolbe who willingly
took the place of a frightened family man in a Nazi gas chamber. Many of you
will know other stories of sacrificial heroism that never made the headlines.

Outside wartime I have just been reading a summary of Martin
Luther King’s heroic stand against racism in 1960s America. It was his explicit choice
as a Christian to confront that evil in a non-violent way that led to certain
suffering.

As riots broke out in places like Los Angeles, Chicago and Harlem, King travelled from city to city trying to cool
tempers and reminding demonstrators that moral change is not accomplished
through immoral means. He had learned that principle from the Sermon on the Mount,
and almost all his speeches reiterated the message. ‘Christianity,’ he said,
‘has always insisted that the cross we bear precedes the crown we wear. To be a
Christian one must take up his cross, with all its difficulties and agonising
and tension-packed content, and carry it until that very cross leaves its mark
upon us and redeems us to that more excellent way which comes only through
suffering.’
(Philip Yancey, Soul Survivor: How My
Faith Survived The Church
, p 25)

Or hear him addressing weary marchers who had trudged from Selma, Montgomery,
to the state capitol:

I know that you are asking today, ‘How
long will it take?’ I come to say to you this afternoon, however difficult the
moment, however frustrating the hour, it will not be long, because truth
pressed to earth will rise again.

How long? Not long, because no lie can
live forever.

How long? Not long, because you will
reap what you sow.

How long? Not long, because the arm of
the moral universe is long but it bends towards justice.

How long? Not long, because ‘cause mine
eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord, trampling out the vintage
where the grapes of wrath are stored. He has loosed the fateful lightning of
his terrible swift sword. His truth is marching on.

He has sounded forth the trumpets that
shall never call retreat. He is lifting up the hearts of man before his
judgment seat. Oh, be swift my soul to answer him. Be jubilant, my feet. Our
God is marching on.
(ibid, p 29f)

Conclusion
No-one has greater love than Jesus who willingly died for
the sins of the world. Our response is to receive the forgiveness he offers
through it and be transformed into those who also will live risky sacrificial
lives for the sake of his kingdom. Can we show ‘greater love’?

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Bible Sunday Sermon: Why Is The Bible Important?

2 Timothy
3:14-4:5

Introduction
A classic text for Bible Sunday today:

All scripture is inspired by God and is
useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in
righteousness
, so that everyone who belongs to God may be
proficient, equipped for every good work.
(2 Timothy 3:16-17)

Not sentiments that many in the world would agree with.
Popular estimations of the Bible range from it containing nice morals that
no-one can attain, to it being a bunch of fairy tales, to the extreme position
held by eminent scientists such as Richard Dawkins that its apparently lovely
stories are a justification for violence (as he claims in his new book The God Delusion).

And inevitably these attitudes influence us in the church.
We can find the Bible irrelevant, unbelievable and even abhorrent. Why, then,
on Bible Sunday, should we hold this
collection of ancient writings in high esteem and make it key to the practice
of Christian faith?

1. Because It Is Inspired
‘All scripture is inspired’, says Paul. A strong statement –
but what does he mean? Let’s quickly dismiss the other alternative translation
possible from the Greek of ‘Every inspired scripture’ which might imply that
some scripture is inspired but other parts aren’t. It’s a tempting translation
to cope with the difficult parts of the Bible, but not one Jews like Paul or
Timothy would have recognised. No, he claims that all scripture is inspired.

But in what sense? Is it like saying that Mozart or Bach
were inspired in their composing? Is it like the fundamentalist claim that God
dictated the words of Scripture to the human writers?

There is a better translation in the NIV. It says, ‘All
scripture is God-breathed’, and George Carey has some helpful words on what
‘God-breathed’ means:

‘It comes from the belief that every
human being has his or her lungs inflated by God’s breath at birth, and that at
death one’s breath was given to him. Heroic figures like the prophets were
thought to have been inspired with a fuller burst of divine breath than
ordinary mortals. Logically then, the sacred writings must have received a
special anointing, because they came from men specially inspired by the breath
of God.’

So it’s about the work of God’s breath, God’s Spirit, in the
writers of Scripture. Now that does not mean dictation of Scripture. When the
Holy Spirit is at work you do not become less human, just being a channel for
words, you become more human. God inspires you and you become passionate to put
that into practice. So I think this sits quite well with some of the evangelical
Christian leaders of pre-fundamentalist times such as the hymn writer Philip
Doddridge and the missionary pioneer Henry Martyn, who said that inspiration
was God giving the thoughts, but men giving the words.

In other words, the Holy Spirit is not a dictator, but a
supervisor. Inspiration is preserved, but so too are the different styles of
the human writers. So you get the Gospel writers giving different accounts of
the same incidents, partly because they each have different messages to convey
about them. It’s why some believing scholars say that we don’t have the ipsissima verbi, the authentic words of
Jesus, but we do have the ipsissima vox,
the authentic voice of Jesus in the Scriptures.

And this is slightly different from saying that an artist or
a composer is inspired. They are using the gifts God has given them, for sure,
but not necessarily in terms of communicating something of lasting importance
about God’s supreme final revelation in Christ. For the great goal of
Scripture, according to Jesus himself in John 5:39, is that the Scriptures
point to him. And he comes to fulfil the Old Testament law, according to
Matthew 5:17.

So the Old Testament points to Christ. Parts of the Jewish
ritual law that we don’t keep have found their fulfilment in him, such as the
laws about sacrifices or the dietary laws. It’s OK; you can eat pork for your
Sunday lunch! Others assume a situation different from ours, where there is a
nation recognising the rule of God. We may find relevance in the sections where
the faithful are a small number in a pagan society.

People may argue that Jesus and Paul were just referring to
the Old Testament. But in Paul’s previous letter to Timothy (at 1 Timothy 5:18)
he quotes a portion of Luke’s Gospel (10:7) as Scripture. And 2 Peter 3:16
refers to Paul’s letters as Scripture. So there was an ongoing recognition of
special inspiration. Eventually the Church made a decision on the inspired
writings, but it wasn’t so much the Church passing judgement as seeking to
discern which writings carried the special anointing.

So first of all, we should take the Bible very seriously
because it is inspired. In doing so
we make greater claims for it than we even do for other helpful spiritual
resources such as the traditions of the Church, spiritual experience and human
reason. And our conviction that the Bible is inspired becomes the bedrock for
struggling with the difficult passages in it and also for the other claims that
Paul makes in our text this morning.

 

2. Because It Is Useful
Our children love books. Often, first thing in the morning,
they will want to bring books to us to read to them. Among their many
favourites are the Thomas The Tank Engine books. And if you have read them you
will know that sometimes the highest form of praise that Thomas gets from the
Fat Controller is to be told he is a Really Useful Engine.

Paul makes claims that the Bible is Really Useful: it ‘is
useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in
righteousness’, he says.

There are many metaphors for the rôle of the Bible in the
Christian life: Augustine called it ‘our letter from home’ and it is sometimes
called God’s love letter. But here Paul sees it more like a tool that God uses.
It is useful, practical.

So it is not to be treated the way I once saw a Muslim
friend treat his mother’s Qu’ran, when he was almost afraid to touch it –
something paralleled in some superstitious distortions of Christianity where
people believe that if you read the Bible your hands and feet will drop off. It
is not to be lauded for the poetry of the Authorised Version – a translation we
now know to be based on less reliable manuscripts than contemporary
translations. It is of practical use, so the habit of some Christians of making
notes in their Bible is not sacrilege as some believe, but a proper application
of treating the Bible as useful.

How is it useful? Paul says it is useful ‘for teaching, for
reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness’. We can take those
four words – teaching, reproof, correction and training – in two pairs.

The first two – teaching and reproof – are about our beliefs. The Bible teaches us what is
right and wrong about God, human life, creation and destiny. Get your moorings
right in your beliefs and you have a good foundation for Christian living –
provided you then apply those beliefs. Get the picture of a loving and holy God
supremely revealed in Jesus Christ, who made us in his image and entered on a
rescue project when we turned from him, and who desires to heal all of wounded
creation, and you will have a sound basis for faith. Get this wrong and if you
have a distorted image of God or humanity you will live a shrivelled, fearful
life that accomplishes little. The Bible is God’s instrument to teach us his
truth and preserve us from the practical dangers of wrong belief.

The second two words – correction and training – are about
our behaviour. Our behaviour needs to
be corrected and we need training in the right way to live. The Bible provides
this, too. It does not simply give us a list of rules, though: it shows us how
to live in tune with the Holy Spirit’s desires for life.

One profound example of the difference this makes will soon
be in the public eye. Next March we celebrate the bicentenary of the abolition
of the slave trade in the British Empire. The
name William Wilberforce will therefore be greatly honoured again. Wilberforce
described his calling as for ‘the reformation of manners’, and this is actually
how the New English Bible translates this part of the verse. Correction and
training in righteousness are what Wilberforce called ‘the reformation of
manners’ – and what a reformation he and others achieved. He was treating his
Bible as a useful book in terms of Christian behaviour. Is it any surprise he
was also one of the founders of the Bible
Society
?

The inspired Bible, then, is useful – significantly useful
in shaping healthy belief and behaviour. This should be a deep motivation for
engaging with it regularly.

3. Because It Is Fruitful
What is the consequence of Paul’s teaching here? It is ‘so
that everyone who belongs to God may be proficient, equipped for every good
work.’ (verse 17).

Do you want to be equipped as a Christian to face the world
with faith and love? Then, says Paul, you need to be someone who drinks deeply
of Scripture. If you do, you will be equipped for Christian discipleship. There
was once a pompous man who introduced himself as a tree expert. Someone
replied, well so is a monkey! Some may study trees, but the monkey lives in
them. So we need to ‘live’ in our Bibles.

Let me therefore make the plea for regular Bible reading.
There are Chinese Christians whose motto is ‘No Bible, no breakfast’. I’m not
going to advocate that as a rule for one and all, worthy as it is to start the
day in tune, because it doesn’t fit everybody’s routines. It certainly wouldn’t
work for us with small children. But just as we make time to eat food, so we
need to make time for spiritual nourishment. Find the right time each day for
you.

You may want to use Bible reading notes, and there are many
to choose from, to fit all sorts of temperaments and abilities. Any Christian
bookshop can show you a wide variety. It’s worth the pilgrimage. I use one designed for Christian
leaders
from Scripture Union.
They are helpful in taking you to read parts of the Bible that you might not
choose if just left to your own limited inclinations. My only caution about
Bible reading notes is you need to read the passage for yourself before reading
the notes.

Read the Bible, too, in fellowship with other Christians. So
a Bible study group like the Tuesday morning one here or the others run in
conjunction with St Mary’s is very helpful. It is only a consequence of the
printing press that people read things alone. Throughout most of history the
books of the Bible have been read communally.

And of course remember that if the Bible is inspired, then
look to the Holy Spirit for illumination as you read (which is another reason
for reading it with other Christians – to check out your understanding). For if
the Bible is inspired, then what makes more sense than to rely deliberately on
the one who supervised the human authors? So read prayerfully. And that may
mean reading slowly, meditating on the words, and reflecting on them by chewing
them over in the presence of God.

I am not going to kid you that all this will always make
Bible reading exciting. Sometimes it will feel deadly dull and you may not
receive any earth-shattering revelations. But you are being equipped.

Think of it like this. I have a friend who realised he was
overweight. He decided the solution was to go running first thing every
morning. Most mornings he would wake up and not feel remotely like getting out
from the warm duvet. But his wife would prod him and remind him he needed to,
so he would. He didn’t feel like it, but he has felt progressively better
physically as a result. And I think it’s a little bit like that with our Bible
reading, too. We may not feel motivated. We may find every excuse not to do it.
But unless we build in a disciplined spiritual habit here, we are risking our
spiritual fitness. There is no short cut, no instant solution for spiritual
maturity. It requires discipline. And one of them is a regular, prayerful
engagement with Scripture.

I conclude with this story. During the reign of terror under
Nicolai Ceaucescu in Romania,
frequent raids were carried out on the homes of Christians. One Eastern
Orthodox Christian called Stephen had his house turned over and books, including
an English translation of the Bible, were removed. It was the loss of the Bible
that hurt him most. ‘Without a Bible, you are not a man,’ he said.

Some of us who have the gift of the Bible are in such danger
of neglecting it that we risk not being men – or women – of deep faith. Why
should we be so cavalier?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Faith And Nation

The Evangelical Alliance report ‘Faith And Nation’, which received press and media coverage in the last couple of days, is now online here. It’s a PDF file and 1.01 MB in size, so perhaps only suitable for online reading if you are on broadband. The Daily Telegraph’s report centres on the proposals about the coronation ceremony and Sunday working; the Daily Express report only mentions the coronation issue; and while the Guardian makes substantial mention of this in its report, it leads on other issues about evangelical relationships with moderate Muslims and support for Muslims facing discrimination. However there are a hundred recommendations in all (which the Guardian briefly acknowledges) and can be found from page 161 onwards in the document.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑