More Absurdity From The Judiciary

This is crackers: a High Court judge has rejected the religious dimension of Freemasonry:

Freemasonry :: Judge backs Freemasons’ role

The judge said that “Freemasonry is not a religion” and that although
members of the order agreed to give “succour” to “brother Masons”, they
were subject to the “uncompromising and clear” principle that they must
pay “due obedience” to the laws of the land.

This is bonkers when Masonry believes God the Architect. Whatever its diversity it has clear religious aspects (which happen to be inimical to the Christian faith). How could Mr Justice Newman miss this?

Technorati Tags: , ,

Forgiveness: Lesley Bilinda

I’ve just received this email and am happy to publicise it:

Hi,
Came
across your blog the other day, and noted that you quoted from the Sunday Times
article on forgiveness. 
You may be interested to know that the DVD featuring Lesley Bilinda’s
story – Hunting My Husband’s Killers – is now available. It follows her story,
as she returns to Rwanda 10 years after the death of her husband in the
genocide, to try and find and forgive the killers of her husband. The DVD has a
number of extras, including short scene extracts with discussion points to get
groups (such as church housegroups etc) talking about issues of forgiveness, a
response to genocide and the church’s involvement in the
atrocities.
Feel free to pass this link on!
Warm regards
phil knox

Technorati Tags: , ,

The Cross Is An Advert

Dudley Wood Methodist Church will have to pay a planning permission fee for erecting a free-standing cross, since it counts as advertising:

BBC NEWS | England | West Midlands | Church is cross over £75 charge

So in what sense is the Cross an advert for the Church and the Gospel? The old Lenny Bruce comment that if Jesus had been born ‘today’, people would not wear crucifixes but jewellery shaped like an electric chair, reminds us of the offensiveness of the Cross. It is the offence of the Cross rather than its attractiveness that is at the heart of the Gospel. We advertise Christ crucified, a stumbling-block and a foolishness to all except those who are being saved. If we’re not advertising the offensive Cross, we’re not proclaiming the Gospel. We need to embrace the offence.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Forgiveness

This is a tragic and heart-wrenching story from yesterday’s Times:

London bombs terror attack The Times and Sunday Times Times Online

The Revd Julie Nicholson lost her daughter Jenny in the 7/7 London bombings last year. She has stood down as a parish priest, because she cannot forgive the suicide bomber who murdered her daughter. One cannot help but respect her integrity and weep for her pain.

There is a companion piece on the site, How They Coped, which appeared as a sidebar in the paper yesterday. Various people who have faced injustice, violence and the loss of a loved one are interviewed on the subject of forgiveness:

Lesley Bilinda, a Christian aid worker whose Rwandan husband was murdered in the 1994 genocide but does not know her murderers, speaks of the difficulty when you do not know who it is you need to forgive. To avoid resentment destroying her, she forgives them in her head since she could not forgive them to their faces.

Lord Tebbit, whose wife Margaret was permanently disabled in the 1984 IRA Brighton bomb, says forgiveness is not meaningful unless the perpetrator shows repentance. If I read him rightly, he does not forgive the bomber, Patrick McGee, because he judges him not to have repented. Christians may well sympathise with Tebbit’s emphasis on repentance but might say that forgiveness still needs to be offered. Where we might agree with him is that the forgiveness does not become effective until it is received by repentance. But that should not stop us offering it and breaking the cycle of hatred. (None of that precludes the proper course of justice.)

Bill Griffiths, an 85-year-old former POW of the Japanese in World War 2, says he will never forgive and he doesn’t speak about it with fellow veterans but then implies a sense of forgiveness by a roundabout route by working for a charity that helps former servicemen. Is he right that this is roundabout forgiveness?

Dr John Sentamu, Archbishop of York, talks about his experiences in Idi Amin’s Uganda. “I am greatly forgiven by a loving God, so when I consider the beating handed out to me by Idi Amin’s murder squad, I have to choose to react in God’s way … I realised that if you do not forgive, your own prayer life is ruined.”

Marina Cantacuzino of The Forgiveness Project says, “Forgiving is not a sign of moral or spiritual superiority but it is a journey, whereas revenge is a cycle.” (I like that: forgiveness isn’t a one-off but a process.) Later she says, “It’s a gift from one person to another, and not something that anyone deserves.” (How true in terms of grace.) Sadly she concludes by saying, “It’s not for everyone, and that has to be respected.”

Colin Parry, whose 12-year-old son Tim was murdered in the 1993 IRA atrocity at Warrington, says, “It’s not that I can’t forgive, it’s that I choose not to.” (Frightening and honest words.) He claims to have avoided the negative emotions by channelling his energies into charity work. Yet the unforgiveness remains. At the same time, I would add, the journey (if I may borrow Marina Cantacuzino’s image) of forgiveness involves what a friend of mine calls befriending our anger, and recognising that it is part of us, not something that came in from outside. There is nothing wrong with a desire for proper justice. But justice and revenge are different.

I hope my little comments are not trite. I have not had a loved one murdered. I hope I never have to face that.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Lent – Going Without?

BBC NEWS | Magazine | Going without This is an article in the BBC online magazine about Thirst For Life, a project from Share Jesus International that is challenging people in the UK to give up alcohol for Lent. Their spokeswoman Emma Morrice says that we don’t need to work so much for things in a consumer society so so we push ourselves to feel more – including alcohol. We also don’t examine things in detail, she claims, thus missing the damage caused by alcohol in our society. (Not sure the latter comment is entirely fair.)

The article asks a psychologist and a philosopher about the merits of giving up something. The psychologist says it is about showing we can exercise some control over our lives. The philosopher thinks it is about clearing our conscience and demonstrating that we we can be virtuous.

In Christian terms the psychologist sounds closer to the Gospel than the philosopher. Self-control is a fruit of the Spirit. But to prove we are virtuous sounds like what Jesus condemns in the Sermon on the Mount about making a show of our piety (including fasting).

Both contributors, however, miss the Christian notion that this bodily self-discipline is about making sure that Christ and not our appetities is Lord. It is about the devotion of love that will give up something because the Beloved is more important.

Most disturbing, however, is to read the list of comments. So many non-Christians are effectively telling Christians to shut up. Many of the comments read as if Christians are not allowed to campaign for anything. There is real vitriol and hatred of us. Part of that may well be about the reputation we have earned in the past, but it’s also highly worrying that we can’t speak up without being condemned.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Danish Cartoons – a sane Christian view?

Joel Edwards of the Evangelical Alliance has some sane things to say here about the violent controversy over the Danish cartoons of Muhammad:

Respect is what you say about me – third of four lectures

True respect, says Edwards, is based for Christians on the notion that all humans are made in the image of God.

I would go on to say that a Christian response would therefore be alarmed when satire crosses the line into abuse and deliberate insult. There is much talk of freedom of speech, but what is freedom in a Christian sense? It is not freedom to do or say what I please: we are set free to do what is right. As such, freedom is not autonomous. And in this sense we should be critical of secular European liberal values. (And it’s curious to see American Christian commentators adopting these values so uncritically.)

But by the same token Christians should be equally alarmed by the violent overtones of the more militant protests. There is no sense of respect there. Nor indeed is there in parts of the Muslim world where it is apparently perfectly acceptable to draw cartoons depicting all Americans as paedophiles. I welcome the more moderate Muslim protests, but even then they would gain more credibility if they condemned not only the violent protests but also the vicious caricatures perpetrated in Muslim cartoons.

Does either side come out of this well?

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Proving Jesus Exists

According to Technorati the most-discussed news story right now is the one where the Italian Catholic priest Father Enrico Righi has been taken to court by Luigi Cascioli, his former school friend, an atheist, and is having to prove that Jesus existed. The atheist won’t allow the New Testament as evidence, nor other writers who lived later than Jesus. Rather slanting the evidence, you would have to say.
 
One of the curious things about this is to see this as an essentially modernist issue. This is a debate about ‘objective’ evidence. For all the importance that Christians happily swimming in the postmodern world put on an apologetics of lifestyle (the best argument for our faith is the transforming effect it has on our lives and how that benefits others) this debate is framed in such a way that it is no surprise to find respondents to the story at Think Christian promoting books such as Josh McDowell’s Evidence That Demands A Verdict and Lee Strobel’s The Case For Christ.
 
It thus serves as a wake-up call to much postmodern Christianity that the old modernism hasn’t completely gone away. Of course responsible postmodern Christian commentators know and acknowledge this, but it can sometimes be overlooked in the emerging rush. Maybe we need both kinds of apologetics.
 
Powered By Qumana

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑