Tomorrow’s Sermon: The Conspiracy Of The Insignificant

2 Kings
5:1-14

Introduction
In early 2005, we realised that Debbie’s car, a Peugeot 306, was no longer
going to be functional as family car. It was insufficiently like the Tardis to
cope with the amount of clutter we needed to cart around with two small
children. Through friends and family, we were quickly converted to the virtues
of a ‘people-carrier’.

We short-listed three different cars: a Vauxhall
Zafira
, Renault
Scenic
and a Citroen
Picasso
. Despite three recommendations for the Zafira, we eliminated it as
too expensive and with too small a boot.

That left the Scenic and the Picasso. For a while, we couldn’t
tell the difference between them in appearance, but we settled on the Picasso and
once we bought one we found that whenever we were out we were always spotting
Picassos on the road. Had they suddenly increased in number once we became
interested in them? No; we had simply become more tuned into them.

Sometimes I find reading the Bible is like that. It isn’t until
I get interested in a particular issue that I realise how much of the Bible
reflects that concern, or is relevant to it.

I had one of those experiences this last week. You will know
by now that one of my concerns is how we are faithful Christian witnesses in a
society where Christianity is no longer central, but on the margins. We live in
a culture whose values have been changing rapidly in recent decades. The Gospel
may not change, but many of our old ways of being church have become obsolete.

I have read the story of Naaman and his healing since Sunday
School. Perhaps you have, too. However, this week when it came up in the Lectionary
I found it was no longer a charming Sunday School story. It was a model for
mission in today’s world. I see it, because the story is set in a time when
Israel was under the cosh from Aram (verses 1-2). A pagan nation with alien
values has mastery over the people of God. Within these strictures, fruitful
mission happens – just as it can in our day when forces are pushing the church to
the margins of society. This week we saw the church-state ties loosened as
Gordon Brown relinquished
some powers
over the appointment of bishops other senior clergy. It opens
up again the whole issue of the Church of England’s established status – and in
my Methodist opinion, that’s a good thing.

So in this context, where the church is less central to our
society, how does the story of Naaman encourage us in our mission? I find it by
exploring the three Israelite characters connected with him: the slave girl,
the king of Israel and Elisha.

1. The Slave Girl
How many of us were shocked by the news a couple of days ago that a
three-year-old girl was kidnapped in Nigeria?
Perhaps we need to think of something like that to understand the horror of
what happened when this young girl was taken captive by the Arameans in 2 Kings
5. Granted, she is probably older than three, given the way she speaks, and
neither is she being threatened by death. However, if you want a sense of the
horror, think Nigeria.

Yet in this situation of trauma and oppression, the young
girl is a star:

She said to her mistress, ‘If only my lord were with the
prophet who is in Samaria! He would cure him of his leprosy.’ (verse 3)

Here is a wounded, marginalised person offering love. Here
is one who as both child and female has no status, yet she offers love. Forgiving
love and compassion for one who has done wrong to her, her family, her religion
and nation. Truly, a little child leads here, as she blesses an enemy.

How does this translate for us? Isn’t one of the dangers of
being a minority that has been sidelined more and more that all we want to do
is carp and snipe at the society that has done this to us? We criticise this,
we declaim about that and we lay into something else. If we’re good, we pretend
we are offering a prophetic critique of the world, but if only we were. More likely,
we are laying bare the chip on our shoulder and giving energy to the resentment
we feel that people no longer see the church as an institution whose opinions
should be sought and respected.

The young slave girl says, bless those who have done this to
you. Look for ways to love and serve them. Search out opportunities to tell
them the good news – not that God can’t
wait to singe them in Hell, but that he is crazy with love for them and
passionate that they find him.

When I ministered in Kent, there was a branch of Ottakar’s bookshops
in Chatham High Street. They regularly displayed and promoted occult books. Alongside
the display there was sometimes the opportunity to sign up for occult meetings.
I shared this with a prayer meeting. The response was interesting. I thought
they would be the kind of Christians who would want to instigate a prayer march
against the shop, and perhaps a letter-writing campaign, too. They didn’t.
Their immediate response was to pray that God would bless the shop and its
employees, because that would be a better way of making a gospel difference.

For us, our ‘Naaman’ might be an unpleasant boss at work. What
might happen if we showed Christian love and concern for that boss’s needs and
difficulties? Or today’s Naaman could be an unjust political group or multinational
corporation. How might we show the love of Christ to them? (And this is the end
of International Boycott Nestlé Week!)

I am not saying we should never criticise or boycott, but we
have to be sure our motive is God’s love, not vindictiveness. The slave girl reminds
us to love and make a difference.

2. The King Of Israel
Naaman goes to his king, who prepares a letter for his opposite number, the
king of Israel. Leave aside for a moment the naïveté that assumes the Israelite
king can heal the soldier. We have to excuse that as innocent ignorance: it’s
something Christians encounter often from people who make requests of them. I often
find it comes in terms of expecting that the minister can do something, which
another Christian can’t. There is no point in criticising this: we cannot
expect complete understanding of our ways.

What is more disappointing is the king of Israel’s response.
He doesn’t give a theological lecture – that would be bad enough. Instead, he
goes on the defensive:

When the king of Israel read the letter, he tore his clothes
and said, ‘Am I God, to give death or life, that this man sends word to me to
cure a man of his leprosy?
Just look and see how he is trying to pick a quarrel with me.’ (verse 7)

The king of Israel cannot see human need for what it is and
respond appropriately. It is as if he knows the story of the Trojan Horse and
sees Naaman’s illness as the way in which Israel will be further weakened.

Is that so far from some of our responses as a Christian
minority today? I don’t think so. There are those who think we shouldn’t
support environmental causes, because we become ‘guilty by association’ with
some crazy green campaigners who happen to think that planet Earth is actually
a goddess named Gaia, and we shouldn’t get our names tarnished by working with
such fruitcakes. The fact that there is ample biblical material for being
environmentally conscious should be enough: God calls us to be stewards of the
earth, not rapists of it.

Alternatively, consider how long it took some Christians to
become concerned with fighting HIV/AIDS, because of its association with sexual
practices that lie outside traditional Christian morality. Thank God that
mentality has changed through the example of organisations like ACET AND TEAR
Fund
, who hold orthodox Christian beliefs, but are at the forefront of
medical prevention and political campaigning.

In a world packed with terrible needs, it would be spiritual
suicide to follow the example of the king of Israel. It’s no good getting on
our high horse about certain moral evils in our society, but doing nothing to
heal the pain.

But let’s bring it close and personal. Who are the people we
know, who have made a mess of their lives, perhaps through their own fault, but
whom we have been resisting the idea of helping? Is now the time to see that we
have made a mistake and need to reach out with Christian compassion? For Debbie
and me recently it’s been about being available to two pregnant women: one is
living with her partner and already has one child by him, the other had a
second child on her own without ongoing involvement from the father of either
child. Neither of these women lives lifestyles with which we agree as
Christians. However, would it surprise you if I told you that one of these
mothers is now asking questions about baptism?

3. Elisha
Surely the story is going to end up with Elisha performing an amazing miracle. It
builds up that way. The slave girl calls him ‘the prophet who is in Samaria
[who] would cure [Naaman] of his leprosy’ (verse 3). The writer of 2 Kings
describes Elisha as ‘the man of God’ (verse 8) and Elisha himself urges the
king of Israel to forward Naaman onto him so ‘that he may learn that there is a
prophet in Israel’ (verse 8).

Therefore, it’s a surprise when Naaman arrives at Elisha’s
house and the great man doesn’t come out to greet him, but sends a messenger,
telling Naaman to wash seven times in the Jordan (verse 10). What’s going on?

Here’s my theory: Naaman has some kind of superstar complex.
He’s miffed that the spiritual hero won’t come out to him (verse 11), and he’s
insulted by the thought of washing in that feeble, insignificant river the
Jordan. He’s got celebrity rivers back in Damascus – the Abana and the Pharpar
(verse 12). So not meeting Elisha and suffering the indignity of the River Jordan
force Naaman away from this hero-worship attitude.

And isn’t that just what we need today? We live in a culture
that needs to be weaned off celebrity adulation, and where people – ooh, let me
think, Chantelle
Houghton
and Paris
Hilton
– are merely famous for being famous. So addicted are we to this
that an informed politician like Al Gore
needs to utilise gas-guzzling pop stars to communicate his planet-saving message. By a conspiracy of
insignificant non-celebrity Christians, operating without spin doctors or
street teams, armed only with the love of Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit,
we subvert a sick culture and bring healing in the name of Jesus.

And that means that the church needs to be healed of her own
addiction to celebrity, too. We may not have the hype and publicity tools
available to entertainers and politicians, but there is an unhealthy reliance
upon famous Christians and Christian leaders. We believe, however, in a priesthood
of all believers, and so it’s time to stop this dependency upon such people and
realise this is a call to all Christians.

In fact, one Christian leader from the Southern Hemisphere, Alan Hirsch, tells a story in his
recent book, ‘The
Forgotten Ways
’ about the early growth of a church
he and his wife led in Melbourne. It did not happen under their leadership, but
before they arrived. George the Greek was a drug dealer who once chose prison
instead of a fine for his crimes. While there he read the Bible and God
encountered him. Upon release, George and his brother John set about sharing
their faith. Within six months, fifty people had become disciples of Jesus. There
were gay men, lesbians, Goths, drug addicts and prostitutes among the converts.
No Christian celebrity or authority figure did this: just George the Greek and
his brother John, loving people into the kingdom.

Conclusion
Ultimately, this takes us full circle, back to the young slave girl, who
blessed her needy, oppressive master. She, Elisha’s messenger and the river
Jordan are the heroes of the story. Elisha knows well to get out of the way
rather than garner praise for himself; sadly, the king of Israel sets no
example at all.

For we who are squeezed daily further to the margins as
Christians in our society, the message is clear: a generation of nobodies, operating
from the fringes of our culture, is God’s apostolic team for the salvation of
the world and the healing of the nations. This morning, as we take Holy
Communion, we enlist for that call.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Fuel Poverty

Rising fuel poverty ‘will hit 3m families’ | Special_reports | Guardian Unlimited Money(-)

Rings true for us – our fuel bills have just increased by £40 per month after the end of a ‘capped’ deal. First casualty: my Methodist Recorder subscription. I’m going to try to keep up with the basics via the web and blogs.

Technorati Tags: ,

Tomorrow’s Sermon: Setting Our Faces Towards Jerusalem

Luke 9:51-62

Introduction
Being a Tottenham Hotspur
supporter, I looked on with considerable unchristian glee this last week when
our deadly rivals Arsenal had to sell
their star player Thierry Henry to Barcelona. I was less impressed on Friday,
when my team signed
Darren Bent for a whopping £16.5 million transfer fee. He has only played three
times for England!

Now this may bore those of you who detest football, and you
may scoff at the ridiculous sums football clubs pay to acquire the services of
modest players. I talked about this on Friday night with the Boys’ Brigade, and
asked them what transfer fee each of them was worth. One boy said he was worth
a tenner, several mentioned sums in the millions, and one lad even presumed to
mention a figure that went into the billions.

I told them all, however, that they had all under-estimated
their value. God wanted them playing on his team and he was prepared to pay a
massive transfer fee so they might play for him and not the opposition. That
price was the giving up of his only begotten Son.[1]

In our reading, Jesus is on his way to pay that price:

When the days drew near for him to be taken up, he set his
face to go to Jerusalem (verse 51).

Jesus knows he is going to be betrayed, suffer, be
crucified, but then be raised from the dead and ascend to the Father’s right
hand. He ‘sets his face’ towards this destiny. Similarly, when he encounters
the three would-be disciples in the second half of the reading, the setting is
‘As they were going along the road’ (verse 57). Not just any road, we are to
understand: it is the road to Jerusalem, the road to suffering and glory.

Therefore, this reading is about those who would walk that
road with Jesus. What does it mean to walk the road of suffering and then glory
with Jesus? Bluntly, what does discipleship entail?

1. Rejection
A Samaritan village doesn’t welcome Jesus’ advance party. It isn’t surprising,
really:

Jewish pilgrims regularly passed through Samaria on their way
to the Jerusalem feasts. Sometimes there was trouble that even led to massacre.
The hostility between Jews and Samaritans at that time is well known.[2]

James and John make the pastorally sensitive suggestion that
Jesus allows them to call down fire from heaven and sizzle the villagers like
sausages (verse 54). No wonder elsewhere Jesus nicknamed them the ‘sons of
thunder’. I remember one preacher saying they must have been the Hell’s Angels
of the apostles.

However, Jesus doesn’t go in for a Hell’s Angels response. He
rebukes them (verse 55) and they move on (verse 56), just as in the next
chapter of Luke’s Gospel he will tell those who don’t get a hearing for the
Gospel to move on.

The point is this: one who is on his way to suffer violence
in order to bring redemption cannot inflict violence on others to further his
purposes.

How we handle rejection is a key issue. For not everyone
will welcome the Christian message, our values or our lifestyle. The disciples
of Jesus are not to repay in kind what has unjustly been dealt to them. We are
not to engage in the spite, vilification and character assassination tactics
that are so common in our world. We are to respond non-violently, with
forgiveness. If even living differently has no positive effect, then we don’t
waste our time, we move on.

There is a time, then, to stop a certain activity, because
it is fruitless. There is a time to stop wasting energy with some people. I
remember being away on a residential training course for my job and sharing
accommodation with an atheist. We debated the existence of God, but eventually
it was apparent that he wasn’t interested in the possibility that he might be
wrong, he was only interested in winding me up and having a bit of intellectual
fun. That was the point at which I stopped wasting my time in the face of
sophisticated rejection. I did not become bitter towards him, but I left him to
the mercy of God.

The disciples of Jesus come across opponents and obstacles
on their road to Jerusalem. But Jesus teaches us that we do not have to face
down every single one of them. Sometimes we simply need to skirt around them,
with a measure of Christian grace.

2. Misfits
If you were preaching the good news of Jesus and someone responded by saying
that they would follow Jesus wherever he went (verse 57), you’d think that was
a wonderful response, wouldn’t you? Yet when someone comes up to Jesus and says
precisely that, he doesn’t immediately invite him to tag along. His response
is:

‘Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the
Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.’ (verse 58)

Jesus isn’t saying, I’m homeless, you’ll always be on the
road with me, so get your sleeping bag ready. In any case, there was a stage in
Jesus’ life where he had the use of a house in Capernaum. He is saying, even
animals get a welcome in this world, but I don’t always. If you want to join me
on the road of discipleship, then be aware from the outset that we are a band
of social misfits. Not that we are lacking in social graces, but we don’t
always receive a welcome. Our lifestyle, convictions and words make people
uncomfortable. We won’t be at the heart of society; we’ll be on the fringes.

This speaks to the regular temptation to make the Christian
message acceptable, respectable and comfortable. It challenges the idea that
the way to make more disciples of Jesus is to lower the bar and make access
easier. Maybe we are tempted to make things sound easier, because we are
concerned by falling church numbers, or by the declining influence of the
church in our society. Yet Jesus warns us that if we do lower the bar then what
we shall end up with will not be disciples. He raises the bar.

What does this mean for us? It’s not a licence to be
obnoxious and offensive, but it is a call to radical faithfulness to our Lord.
In the words of Michael Frost,
we shall live like exiles
in today’s world: exiles from comfortable religion, and exiles from a worldwide
empire that worships a globalisation that feeds off consumerism, environmental
destruction and persecution. Refusing to worship the almighty dollar, we shall
be pushed to the margins. But that is where we shall live faithful lives of
witness to Christ.

3. Duty
‘Who is a funeral for?’ asked our worship tutor during my first degree.
Catholics, he went on to explain, see the funeral as being for the deceased,
whereas Protestants see it as being to comfort the bereaved.

None of which counted for anything when, in my first
appointment, I encountered Lily and George. Blunt Yorkshire people, George was
never a well man. And when he died, Lily said there was to be no funeral. In
her estimation, it was a waste of time and money. It wouldn’t bring her beloved
George back, and she had to get on with life without him. I didn’t know how to
respond. Nor did people in the church.

I think of Lily when I hear Jesus telling the man who wanted
to bury his father first that the dead should bury their own dead, and that the
man’s duty was to proclaim the kingdom of God (verses 59-60). I am not
suggesting that we abolish funerals, and I do not plan to stop accepting
requests to conduct them. I have found them important staging posts in people’s
grief, and I regularly conducted funerals for non-Christians in the last
circuit, because it was an opportunity to show Christian compassion. I knew an
Anglican vicar who refused to take such funerals, quoting Jesus’ words here,
Let the dead bury their own dead.’ I think he was terribly wrong.

However, Jesus’ shocking words force us to one unpopular
conclusion: our duty to proclaim the kingdom of God transcends all social
conventions, however important they are. The other example in Scripture is God
forbidding the prophet Ezekiel from mourning the death of his wife (Ezekiel 24:15-24). In some
social circumstances, it is not ‘done’ to talk about faith – when Alistair
Campbell was Tony Blair’s spin-doctor and told Vanity Fair magazine ‘We don’t
do God’, he was tapping into something that is widely accepted in British
society. Just as the Victorians didn’t talk about sex, so we don’t talk about
death or religion.

And indeed, I once knew a Methodist minister who proudly
told a group of teenagers that he had joined a society where the one rule was
that you didn’t talk about faith. Yet there cannot be any no-go areas for
Christians in proclaiming the kingdom of God. This is not a call to be insensitive,
it is not an appeal for Bible-bashing, but it is to say that the followers of
Jesus cannot allow society to dictate whether or when we speak about God. If
people need to hear, we shall speak. If it makes us unpopular, so be it.
Popularity is not what we court, however much we feel the natural human desire
to be liked. What counts for us is that one day we shall hear a voice saying
not, ‘Many people liked you,’ but, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant.’

4. Urgency
You may remember in 1983 that the Daily
Mail
ran a story about the Moonies, entitled ‘The
Church That Breaks Up Families
’. It led to the longest libel case in
British legal history, and the Mail won. The idea that a religion or a sect
could break up families was proved, and roundly condemned.

So how do we hear Jesus denying another prospective disciple
the right to say farewell to his family (verses 61-62)? Probably some atheists
would use this as evidence that Jesus is really a cultist. And in an age when
the CEO of Sony in the USA, Howard Stringer, a married man with two children,
can say at a company meeting without blushing, ‘I don’t see my family much. My
family is you’, surely we’d like Jesus to say something different? Likewise,
when the chief executive of General Electric, Jeff Immelt, can tell a
journalist he is married with an eighteen-year-old daughter, and he’s worked
hundred-hour weeks at the company for the last twenty years, wouldn’t we like
Jesus to affirm the value of family? (See Bill Kinnon.) And
wouldn’t I like help about balancing family life and ministry? But no. ‘No one
who puts a hand to the plough and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.’
(verse 62)

I conclude that Jesus is not telling us to neglect our
families; he’s telling us that people who keep looking backwards to what once
was do not apply themselves wholeheartedly as the kingdom of God requires. When
we hesitate to follow the call, we go off course. When we delay our obedience
to Christ, we steer a wonky furrow.

Therefore, when we know God has spoken, it isn’t a time for
excuses. That is to look back and skew the direction of the plough. Moreover, when
God speaks to us about something new he wants us to do, it isn’t the time to
use the seven last words of a dying church: ‘But we’ve always done it that way.’
That steers us off the course God has for us now. When we face new problems and
God takes us in a different direction, that isn’t the time to bemoan the way it
was in the good old days. Don’t look back, says Jesus; look forward. That is
the nature of kingdom obedience.

Conclusion
Preachers are trained to look at their sermons and ask where the good news is. You
might be forgiven for dwelling on the themes of this sermon and wondering where
the good news is, when Jesus spells out a journey that includes rejection,
being misfits, doing our duty in the face of social opposition and pushing
relentlessly forward, not being allowed to dwell in the warmth of glowing
memories.

However, I think the good news comes in this sense. Yes,
Jesus ‘set his face to go to Jerusalem’ (verse 51), and there, he knew that
suffering awaited him. A journey like this may mean conflict, difficulties and
tribulation for us. Nevertheless, Jesus headed for Jerusalem, because it was
the place where he would ‘be taken up’ (verse 51). ‘Being taken up’ didn’t just
mean the Cross; it also meant the Resurrection and the Ascension. We too may be
on a troublesome journey at times, and like Jesus we may well want to ask the
Father to ‘take this cup’ from us. But within it lies the satisfaction of doing
God’s will, and beyond it lies the glory of God.

Let us press on, as radical disciples of Jesus, in the
service of the kingdom.


[1]
And yes, I know this analogy has all the imperfections of the ransom imagery:
to whom is the ransom/fee paid? However, it is only an image.

[2]
John Nolland, Luke 9:21-18:34 (Word
Biblical Commentary)
; Dallas, Word, 1993, p537.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tomorrow’s Sermon: Setting Our Faces Towards Jerusalem

Luke 9:51-62

Introduction
Being a Tottenham Hotspur
supporter, I looked on with considerable unchristian glee this last week when
our deadly rivals Arsenal had to sell
their star player Thierry Henry to Barcelona. I was less impressed on Friday,
when my team signed
Darren Bent for a whopping £16.5 million transfer fee. He has only played three
times for England!

Now this may bore those of you who detest football, and you
may scoff at the ridiculous sums football clubs pay to acquire the services of
modest players. I talked about this on Friday night with the Boys’ Brigade, and
asked them what transfer fee each of them was worth. One boy said he was worth
a tenner, several mentioned sums in the millions, and one lad even presumed to
mention a figure that went into the billions.

I told them all, however, that they had all under-estimated
their value. God wanted them playing on his team and he was prepared to pay a
massive transfer fee so they might play for him and not the opposition. That
price was the giving up of his only begotten Son.[1]

In our reading, Jesus is on his way to pay that price:

When the days drew near for him to be taken up, he set his
face to go to Jerusalem (verse 51).

Jesus knows he is going to be betrayed, suffer, be
crucified, but then be raised from the dead and ascend to the Father’s right
hand. He ‘sets his face’ towards this destiny. Similarly, when he encounters
the three would-be disciples in the second half of the reading, the setting is
‘As they were going along the road’ (verse 57). Not just any road, we are to
understand: it is the road to Jerusalem, the road to suffering and glory.

Therefore, this reading is about those who would walk that
road with Jesus. What does it mean to walk the road of suffering and then glory
with Jesus? Bluntly, what does discipleship entail?

1. Rejection
A Samaritan village doesn’t welcome Jesus’ advance party. It isn’t surprising,
really:

Jewish pilgrims regularly passed through Samaria on their way
to the Jerusalem feasts. Sometimes there was trouble that even led to massacre.
The hostility between Jews and Samaritans at that time is well known.[2]

James and John make the pastorally sensitive suggestion that
Jesus allows them to call down fire from heaven and sizzle the villagers like
sausages (verse 54). No wonder elsewhere Jesus nicknamed them the ‘sons of
thunder’. I remember one preacher saying they must have been the Hell’s Angels
of the apostles.

However, Jesus doesn’t go in for a Hell’s Angels response. He
rebukes them (verse 55) and they move on (verse 56), just as in the next
chapter of Luke’s Gospel he will tell those who don’t get a hearing for the
Gospel to move on.

The point is this: one who is on his way to suffer violence
in order to bring redemption cannot inflict violence on others to further his
purposes.

How we handle rejection is a key issue. For not everyone
will welcome the Christian message, our values or our lifestyle. The disciples
of Jesus are not to repay in kind what has unjustly been dealt to them. We are
not to engage in the spite, vilification and character assassination tactics
that are so common in our world. We are to respond non-violently, with
forgiveness. If even living differently has no positive effect, then we don’t
waste our time, we move on.

There is a time, then, to stop a certain activity, because
it is fruitless. There is a time to stop wasting energy with some people. I
remember being away on a residential training course for my job and sharing
accommodation with an atheist. We debated the existence of God, but eventually
it was apparent that he wasn’t interested in the possibility that he might be
wrong, he was only interested in winding me up and having a bit of intellectual
fun. That was the point at which I stopped wasting my time in the face of
sophisticated rejection. I did not become bitter towards him, but I left him to
the mercy of God.

The disciples of Jesus come across opponents and obstacles
on their road to Jerusalem. But Jesus teaches us that we do not have to face
down every single one of them. Sometimes we simply need to skirt around them,
with a measure of Christian grace.

2. Misfits
If you were preaching the good news of Jesus and someone responded by saying
that they would follow Jesus wherever he went (verse 57), you’d think that was
a wonderful response, wouldn’t you? Yet when someone comes up to Jesus and says
precisely that, he doesn’t immediately invite him to tag along. His response
is:

‘Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the
Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.’ (verse 58)

Jesus isn’t saying, I’m homeless, you’ll always be on the
road with me, so get your sleeping bag ready. In any case, there was a stage in
Jesus’ life where he had the use of a house in Capernaum. He is saying, even
animals get a welcome in this world, but I don’t always. If you want to join me
on the road of discipleship, then be aware from the outset that we are a band
of social misfits. Not that we are lacking in social graces, but we don’t
always receive a welcome. Our lifestyle, convictions and words make people
uncomfortable. We won’t be at the heart of society; we’ll be on the fringes.

This speaks to the regular temptation to make the Christian
message acceptable, respectable and comfortable. It challenges the idea that
the way to make more disciples of Jesus is to lower the bar and make access
easier. Maybe we are tempted to make things sound easier, because we are
concerned by falling church numbers, or by the declining influence of the
church in our society. Yet Jesus warns us that if we do lower the bar then what
we shall end up with will not be disciples. He raises the bar.

What does this mean for us? It’s not a licence to be
obnoxious and offensive, but it is a call to radical faithfulness to our Lord.
In the words of Michael Frost,
we shall live like exiles
in today’s world: exiles from comfortable religion, and exiles from a worldwide
empire that worships a globalisation that feeds off consumerism, environmental
destruction and persecution. Refusing to worship the almighty dollar, we shall
be pushed to the margins. But that is where we shall live faithful lives of
witness to Christ.

3. Duty
‘Who is a funeral for?’ asked our worship tutor during my first degree.
Catholics, he went on to explain, see the funeral as being for the deceased,
whereas Protestants see it as being to comfort the bereaved.

None of which counted for anything when, in my first
appointment, I encountered Lily and George. Blunt Yorkshire people, George was
never a well man. And when he died, Lily said there was to be no funeral. In
her estimation, it was a waste of time and money. It wouldn’t bring her beloved
George back, and she had to get on with life without him. I didn’t know how to
respond. Nor did people in the church.

I think of Lily when I hear Jesus telling the man who wanted
to bury his father first that the dead should bury their own dead, and that the
man’s duty was to proclaim the kingdom of God (verses 59-60). I am not
suggesting that we abolish funerals, and I do not plan to stop accepting
requests to conduct them. I have found them important staging posts in people’s
grief, and I regularly conducted funerals for non-Christians in the last
circuit, because it was an opportunity to show Christian compassion. I knew an
Anglican vicar who refused to take such funerals, quoting Jesus’ words here,
Let the dead bury their own dead.’ I think he was terribly wrong.

However, Jesus’ shocking words force us to one unpopular
conclusion: our duty to proclaim the kingdom of God transcends all social
conventions, however important they are. The other example in Scripture is God
forbidding the prophet Ezekiel from mourning the death of his wife (Ezekiel 24:15-24). In some
social circumstances, it is not ‘done’ to talk about faith – when Alistair
Campbell was Tony Blair’s spin-doctor and told Vanity Fair magazine ‘We don’t
do God’, he was tapping into something that is widely accepted in British
society. Just as the Victorians didn’t talk about sex, so we don’t talk about
death or religion.

And indeed, I once knew a Methodist minister who proudly
told a group of teenagers that he had joined a society where the one rule was
that you didn’t talk about faith. Yet there cannot be any no-go areas for
Christians in proclaiming the kingdom of God. This is not a call to be insensitive,
it is not an appeal for Bible-bashing, but it is to say that the followers of
Jesus cannot allow society to dictate whether or when we speak about God. If
people need to hear, we shall speak. If it makes us unpopular, so be it.
Popularity is not what we court, however much we feel the natural human desire
to be liked. What counts for us is that one day we shall hear a voice saying
not, ‘Many people liked you,’ but, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant.’

4. Urgency
You may remember in 1983 that the Daily
Mail
ran a story about the Moonies, entitled ‘The
Church That Breaks Up Families
’. It led to the longest libel case in
British legal history, and the Mail won. The idea that a religion or a sect
could break up families was proved, and roundly condemned.

So how do we hear Jesus denying another prospective disciple
the right to say farewell to his family (verses 61-62)? Probably some atheists
would use this as evidence that Jesus is really a cultist. And in an age when
the CEO of Sony in the USA, Howard Stringer, a married man with two children,
can say at a company meeting without blushing, ‘I don’t see my family much. My
family is you’, surely we’d like Jesus to say something different? Likewise,
when the chief executive of General Electric, Jeff Immelt, can tell a
journalist he is married with an eighteen-year-old daughter, and he’s worked
hundred-hour weeks at the company for the last twenty years, wouldn’t we like
Jesus to affirm the value of family? (See Bill Kinnon.) And
wouldn’t I like help about balancing family life and ministry? But no. ‘No one
who puts a hand to the plough and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.’
(verse 62)

I conclude that Jesus is not telling us to neglect our
families; he’s telling us that people who keep looking backwards to what once
was do not apply themselves wholeheartedly as the kingdom of God requires. When
we hesitate to follow the call, we go off course. When we delay our obedience
to Christ, we steer a wonky furrow.

Therefore, when we know God has spoken, it isn’t a time for
excuses. That is to look back and skew the direction of the plough. Moreover, when
God speaks to us about something new he wants us to do, it isn’t the time to
use the seven last words of a dying church: ‘But we’ve always done it that way.’
That steers us off the course God has for us now. When we face new problems and
God takes us in a different direction, that isn’t the time to bemoan the way it
was in the good old days. Don’t look back, says Jesus; look forward. That is
the nature of kingdom obedience.

Conclusion
Preachers are trained to look at their sermons and ask where the good news is. You
might be forgiven for dwelling on the themes of this sermon and wondering where
the good news is, when Jesus spells out a journey that includes rejection,
being misfits, doing our duty in the face of social opposition and pushing
relentlessly forward, not being allowed to dwell in the warmth of glowing
memories.

However, I think the good news comes in this sense. Yes,
Jesus ‘set his face to go to Jerusalem’ (verse 51), and there, he knew that
suffering awaited him. A journey like this may mean conflict, difficulties and
tribulation for us. Nevertheless, Jesus headed for Jerusalem, because it was
the place where he would ‘be taken up’ (verse 51). ‘Being taken up’ didn’t just
mean the Cross; it also meant the Resurrection and the Ascension. We too may be
on a troublesome journey at times, and like Jesus we may well want to ask the
Father to ‘take this cup’ from us. But within it lies the satisfaction of doing
God’s will, and beyond it lies the glory of God.

Let us press on, as radical disciples of Jesus, in the
service of the kingdom.


[1]
And yes, I know this analogy has all the imperfections of the ransom imagery:
to whom is the ransom/fee paid? However, it is only an image.

[2]
John Nolland, Luke 9:21-18:34 (Word
Biblical Commentary)
; Dallas, Word, 1993, p537.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Tomorrow’s Sermon: Setting Our Faces Towards Jerusalem

Luke 9:51-62

Introduction
Being a Tottenham Hotspur
supporter, I looked on with considerable unchristian glee this last week when
our deadly rivals Arsenal had to sell
their star player Thierry Henry to Barcelona. I was less impressed on Friday,
when my team signed
Darren Bent for a whopping £16.5 million transfer fee. He has only played three
times for England!

Now this may bore those of you who detest football, and you
may scoff at the ridiculous sums football clubs pay to acquire the services of
modest players. I talked about this on Friday night with the Boys’ Brigade, and
asked them what transfer fee each of them was worth. One boy said he was worth
a tenner, several mentioned sums in the millions, and one lad even presumed to
mention a figure that went into the billions.

I told them all, however, that they had all under-estimated
their value. God wanted them playing on his team and he was prepared to pay a
massive transfer fee so they might play for him and not the opposition. That
price was the giving up of his only begotten Son.[1]

In our reading, Jesus is on his way to pay that price:

When the days drew near for him to be taken up, he set his
face to go to Jerusalem (verse 51).

Jesus knows he is going to be betrayed, suffer, be
crucified, but then be raised from the dead and ascend to the Father’s right
hand. He ‘sets his face’ towards this destiny. Similarly, when he encounters
the three would-be disciples in the second half of the reading, the setting is
‘As they were going along the road’ (verse 57). Not just any road, we are to
understand: it is the road to Jerusalem, the road to suffering and glory.

Therefore, this reading is about those who would walk that
road with Jesus. What does it mean to walk the road of suffering and then glory
with Jesus? Bluntly, what does discipleship entail?

1. Rejection
A Samaritan village doesn’t welcome Jesus’ advance party. It isn’t surprising,
really:

Jewish pilgrims regularly passed through Samaria on their way
to the Jerusalem feasts. Sometimes there was trouble that even led to massacre.
The hostility between Jews and Samaritans at that time is well known.[2]

James and John make the pastorally sensitive suggestion that
Jesus allows them to call down fire from heaven and sizzle the villagers like
sausages (verse 54). No wonder elsewhere Jesus nicknamed them the ‘sons of
thunder’. I remember one preacher saying they must have been the Hell’s Angels
of the apostles.

However, Jesus doesn’t go in for a Hell’s Angels response. He
rebukes them (verse 55) and they move on (verse 56), just as in the next
chapter of Luke’s Gospel he will tell those who don’t get a hearing for the
Gospel to move on.

The point is this: one who is on his way to suffer violence
in order to bring redemption cannot inflict violence on others to further his
purposes.

How we handle rejection is a key issue. For not everyone
will welcome the Christian message, our values or our lifestyle. The disciples
of Jesus are not to repay in kind what has unjustly been dealt to them. We are
not to engage in the spite, vilification and character assassination tactics
that are so common in our world. We are to respond non-violently, with
forgiveness. If even living differently has no positive effect, then we don’t
waste our time, we move on.

There is a time, then, to stop a certain activity, because
it is fruitless. There is a time to stop wasting energy with some people. I
remember being away on a residential training course for my job and sharing
accommodation with an atheist. We debated the existence of God, but eventually
it was apparent that he wasn’t interested in the possibility that he might be
wrong, he was only interested in winding me up and having a bit of intellectual
fun. That was the point at which I stopped wasting my time in the face of
sophisticated rejection. I did not become bitter towards him, but I left him to
the mercy of God.

The disciples of Jesus come across opponents and obstacles
on their road to Jerusalem. But Jesus teaches us that we do not have to face
down every single one of them. Sometimes we simply need to skirt around them,
with a measure of Christian grace.

2. Misfits
If you were preaching the good news of Jesus and someone responded by saying
that they would follow Jesus wherever he went (verse 57), you’d think that was
a wonderful response, wouldn’t you? Yet when someone comes up to Jesus and says
precisely that, he doesn’t immediately invite him to tag along. His response
is:

‘Foxes have holes, and birds of the air have nests; but the
Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head.’ (verse 58)

Jesus isn’t saying, I’m homeless, you’ll always be on the
road with me, so get your sleeping bag ready. In any case, there was a stage in
Jesus’ life where he had the use of a house in Capernaum. He is saying, even
animals get a welcome in this world, but I don’t always. If you want to join me
on the road of discipleship, then be aware from the outset that we are a band
of social misfits. Not that we are lacking in social graces, but we don’t
always receive a welcome. Our lifestyle, convictions and words make people
uncomfortable. We won’t be at the heart of society; we’ll be on the fringes.

This speaks to the regular temptation to make the Christian
message acceptable, respectable and comfortable. It challenges the idea that
the way to make more disciples of Jesus is to lower the bar and make access
easier. Maybe we are tempted to make things sound easier, because we are
concerned by falling church numbers, or by the declining influence of the
church in our society. Yet Jesus warns us that if we do lower the bar then what
we shall end up with will not be disciples. He raises the bar.

What does this mean for us? It’s not a licence to be
obnoxious and offensive, but it is a call to radical faithfulness to our Lord.
In the words of Michael Frost,
we shall live like exiles
in today’s world: exiles from comfortable religion, and exiles from a worldwide
empire that worships a globalisation that feeds off consumerism, environmental
destruction and persecution. Refusing to worship the almighty dollar, we shall
be pushed to the margins. But that is where we shall live faithful lives of
witness to Christ.

3. Duty
‘Who is a funeral for?’ asked our worship tutor during my first degree.
Catholics, he went on to explain, see the funeral as being for the deceased,
whereas Protestants see it as being to comfort the bereaved.

None of which counted for anything when, in my first
appointment, I encountered Lily and George. Blunt Yorkshire people, George was
never a well man. And when he died, Lily said there was to be no funeral. In
her estimation, it was a waste of time and money. It wouldn’t bring her beloved
George back, and she had to get on with life without him. I didn’t know how to
respond. Nor did people in the church.

I think of Lily when I hear Jesus telling the man who wanted
to bury his father first that the dead should bury their own dead, and that the
man’s duty was to proclaim the kingdom of God (verses 59-60). I am not
suggesting that we abolish funerals, and I do not plan to stop accepting
requests to conduct them. I have found them important staging posts in people’s
grief, and I regularly conducted funerals for non-Christians in the last
circuit, because it was an opportunity to show Christian compassion. I knew an
Anglican vicar who refused to take such funerals, quoting Jesus’ words here,
Let the dead bury their own dead.’ I think he was terribly wrong.

However, Jesus’ shocking words force us to one unpopular
conclusion: our duty to proclaim the kingdom of God transcends all social
conventions, however important they are. The other example in Scripture is God
forbidding the prophet Ezekiel from mourning the death of his wife (Ezekiel 24:15-24). In some
social circumstances, it is not ‘done’ to talk about faith – when Alistair
Campbell was Tony Blair’s spin-doctor and told Vanity Fair magazine ‘We don’t
do God’, he was tapping into something that is widely accepted in British
society. Just as the Victorians didn’t talk about sex, so we don’t talk about
death or religion.

And indeed, I once knew a Methodist minister who proudly
told a group of teenagers that he had joined a society where the one rule was
that you didn’t talk about faith. Yet there cannot be any no-go areas for
Christians in proclaiming the kingdom of God. This is not a call to be insensitive,
it is not an appeal for Bible-bashing, but it is to say that the followers of
Jesus cannot allow society to dictate whether or when we speak about God. If
people need to hear, we shall speak. If it makes us unpopular, so be it.
Popularity is not what we court, however much we feel the natural human desire
to be liked. What counts for us is that one day we shall hear a voice saying
not, ‘Many people liked you,’ but, ‘Well done, good and faithful servant.’

4. Urgency
You may remember in 1983 that the Daily
Mail
ran a story about the Moonies, entitled ‘The
Church That Breaks Up Families
’. It led to the longest libel case in
British legal history, and the Mail won. The idea that a religion or a sect
could break up families was proved, and roundly condemned.

So how do we hear Jesus denying another prospective disciple
the right to say farewell to his family (verses 61-62)? Probably some atheists
would use this as evidence that Jesus is really a cultist. And in an age when
the CEO of Sony in the USA, Howard Stringer, a married man with two children,
can say at a company meeting without blushing, ‘I don’t see my family much. My
family is you’, surely we’d like Jesus to say something different? Likewise,
when the chief executive of General Electric, Jeff Immelt, can tell a
journalist he is married with an eighteen-year-old daughter, and he’s worked
hundred-hour weeks at the company for the last twenty years, wouldn’t we like
Jesus to affirm the value of family? (See Bill Kinnon.) And
wouldn’t I like help about balancing family life and ministry? But no. ‘No one
who puts a hand to the plough and looks back is fit for the kingdom of God.’
(verse 62)

I conclude that Jesus is not telling us to neglect our
families; he’s telling us that people who keep looking backwards to what once
was do not apply themselves wholeheartedly as the kingdom of God requires. When
we hesitate to follow the call, we go off course. When we delay our obedience
to Christ, we steer a wonky furrow.

Therefore, when we know God has spoken, it isn’t a time for
excuses. That is to look back and skew the direction of the plough. Moreover, when
God speaks to us about something new he wants us to do, it isn’t the time to
use the seven last words of a dying church: ‘But we’ve always done it that way.’
That steers us off the course God has for us now. When we face new problems and
God takes us in a different direction, that isn’t the time to bemoan the way it
was in the good old days. Don’t look back, says Jesus; look forward. That is
the nature of kingdom obedience.

Conclusion
Preachers are trained to look at their sermons and ask where the good news is. You
might be forgiven for dwelling on the themes of this sermon and wondering where
the good news is, when Jesus spells out a journey that includes rejection,
being misfits, doing our duty in the face of social opposition and pushing
relentlessly forward, not being allowed to dwell in the warmth of glowing
memories.

However, I think the good news comes in this sense. Yes,
Jesus ‘set his face to go to Jerusalem’ (verse 51), and there, he knew that
suffering awaited him. A journey like this may mean conflict, difficulties and
tribulation for us. Nevertheless, Jesus headed for Jerusalem, because it was
the place where he would ‘be taken up’ (verse 51). ‘Being taken up’ didn’t just
mean the Cross; it also meant the Resurrection and the Ascension. We too may be
on a troublesome journey at times, and like Jesus we may well want to ask the
Father to ‘take this cup’ from us. But within it lies the satisfaction of doing
God’s will, and beyond it lies the glory of God.

Let us press on, as radical disciples of Jesus, in the
service of the kingdom.


[1]
And yes, I know this analogy has all the imperfections of the ransom imagery:
to whom is the ransom/fee paid? However, it is only an image.

[2]
John Nolland, Luke 9:21-18:34 (Word
Biblical Commentary)
; Dallas, Word, 1993, p537.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Petitions

I’ve just signed two online petitions: one calling on the BMA to reject its Ethics Committee’s recommendation to campaign for abortion on demand in the first trimester of pregnancy, and the second calling for the release of BBC journalist Alan Johnston. i don’t know always how valuable petitions are, but perhaps these are my small and weak way of adding my voice to these causes.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Silver Ring Thing Case

In the news today: Sussex teenager Lydia Playfoot has taken her former school to the High Court on appeal, because they will not let her wear a ring symbolising the Christian belief in sexual abstinence outside marriage. Judgment has been reserved to a future date, according to the BBC report.

Ms Playfoot is the daughter of two workers for Silver Ring Thing UK. She argues that the school has contravened her human right to freedom of religious expression, that they have shown anti-Christian bias, because Sikh and Muslim pupils can wear bangles and headscarves in class. She believes the school does not respect this aspect of Christianity, which is counter-cultural in today’s society.

In contrast the head teacher, Leon Nettley, sees it as an issue of basic school uniform. The school argues that Sikh and Muslim pupils are only allowed to wear items integral to their religious beliefs, whereas the silver ring is not for Christians. However they would allow a Christian pupil to wear a crucifix. It further says that in choosing the school, the Playfoots voluntarily accepted the uniform code.

It’s interesting to try to assess the arguments from a Christian perspective. Certainly it is easy to observe that headscarves or more severe coverings are integral to Islam for females. The silver ring, being a recent development, cannot be said to be integral to Christianity. Sexual abstinence outside marriage is, however, traditionally fundamental to Christian ethics.

What is strange is the school’s argument that a crucifix is integral. It depicts the central and defining episode of the Christian narrative, namely the Cross, but it is not mandatory to wear. This makes the school’s case rather odd; it appears ill-informed.

Yet if one reads the New Testament wondering what the fundamental Christian symbols are, the replies would not be in terms of jewellery or material objects, but in terms of lifestyles (of which abstinence outside marriage is one, as is taking up one’s cross). These are the primary witnesses for Christians.

Another question is about the effectiveness of the abstinence campaigns among young people, and I say that as one who does not wish to undermine this ethical stance. Critics of the Bush administration’s support for such programmes have pointed out that they do not achieve a higher success rate than the rest of the population. Taking vows and wearing rings do not of themselves improve moral behaviour. That requires God’s grace and the power of the Holy Spirit.

Of course Silver Ring Thing teaching is big on forgiveness, even saying that teens who have become sexually active can be forgiven and receive a ‘second virginity‘. They also train youth leaders to support the teenagers in their care. Their course offers help in facing temptation, building healthy relationships, recognising consequences and allowing God to take control of one’s sexual life. That sounds much more healthy than a naïve ‘just say no’ campaign, and is much better than a ‘safe sex’ campaign that reduces everything to biological health, not moral health. Unfortunately the statistics page only gives all the negatives about social trends; it doesn’t, or isn’t able to, give any idea about the success of the SRT programme.

The question arises, then, about how positive a witness SRT is – noble as its intentions are. I find it interesting to compare this approach with something I read today. My current reading is Michael Frost‘s book ‘Exiles: Living Missionally In A Post-Christian Culture‘. On page 124 he quotes from page 189 of Alison Morgan‘s book ‘The Wild Gospel: Bringing Truth To Life‘. Morgan says,

Anxiety … means that insofar as we do engage with the world out there, our contribution is mostly a worried attempt to restrain it; afraid for our children, we strive to uphold the moral standards of a sliding culture by campaigning against abortion or disapproving of stories about wizards, The result is that we keep our moral and spiritual integrity, but our witness is lost.

I guess Lydia Playfoot’s ring will have caused some immediate conversations with her peers about her faith; what will count most is the living out of what it symbolises, in a positive and missional way, not a defensive or judgmental way. I fear that using a court case to maintain her ‘human rights’ may be construed as a defensive approach where, in Morgan’s terms, her ‘witness is lost’. I hope I am wrong.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑