This is crackers: a High Court judge has rejected the religious dimension of Freemasonry:
Freemasonry :: Judge backs Freemasons’ role
The judge said that “Freemasonry is not a religion” and that although
members of the order agreed to give “succour” to “brother Masons”, they
were subject to the “uncompromising and clear” principle that they must
pay “due obedience” to the laws of the land.
This is bonkers when Masonry believes God the Architect. Whatever its diversity it has clear religious aspects (which happen to be inimical to the Christian faith). How could Mr Justice Newman miss this?
Technorati Tags: High+Court, Freemasonry, religion
What Do You Think?