One Rule For Them, Part 2

Downing Street won’t disclose whether Gordon Brown has applied for a Criminal Records Bureau check in order to undertake voluntary work this summer. We don’t know what the work will be, so we don’t know whether he would have to, but Number 10 won’t give any more information for ‘obvious reasons’.

Yes, so obvious that nobody can see what they are. If it’s straightforward unpaid work with children or vulnerable adults, what does he have to hide? Isn’t that the line politicians give us about new restrictions on our liberty? If we have nothing to hide, we have nothing to fear. Except Gordon, apparently. Remember, this Government has recent form in this area.

Harriet Harman suggests applying ‘common sense’ to MPs’ need to be vetted – the very thing they (rightly) deny to the general public. It’s still double standards, just like claiming accountancy expenses. Not that you can trust the Criminal Records Bureau, mind you.

Do I have it in for this shower? I don’t particularly expect a Conservative administration would be morally superior, not on the day when shadow Commons leader Alan Duncan has been exposed complaining that MPs live on ‘rations’. But this is the bunch exercising power at present, and it’s only right they be held accountable. But then, that’s something they aren’t keen on, are they? And power without accountability is lethal. They may just have to settle for the next General Election.

An Announcement

You may have noticed that postings have been far less frequent on this blog in the last month. I have also been slower than usual to respond to comments. There is a reason for this. Debbie and I have been very absorbed by a major change of direction in our lives. My current appointment here in Chelmsford runs out in a year’s time. We had been exploring staying on beyond then. However, four weeks ago, we changed our minds and decided we wanted to leave next year.

This has had all sorts of ramifications. I cannot go into them in public: Methodist policy asks ministers and circuit leaders not to discuss the reasons for such decisions in public, especially on social networking sites, blogs or the like. Not only am I bound by that policy, I also think it is wise advice. For that reason, I am confining my announcement here to these bare facts and taking the unusual step of not allowing comments on this post. However, I thought my regular readers (both of you) would like to know this, and I believe that by simply making the factual announcement but not having a public discussion of it, I have kept to the letter and spirit of our Good Practice Guide. It is effectively the same as the announcement made to my churches on 12th July.

We shall soon be putting together a profile as we seek a new appointment for next year. Please pray for us. Thank you.

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑