Songs That Drive You Mad

Very funny post at Stuff Christians Like regarding overdone and maddening worship songs (via Think Christian). Much as many the tunes to many traditional hymns leave me trying to stay awake or reaching out for the Prozac, and much as their words mean I need a concordance (maybe not so bad a thing), it set me off thinking about some of the daft lyrics and actions associated with worship songs and choruses. I’m not touching on the ‘Jesus is my boyfriend’ phenomenon, but here are some easy targets:

Actions: I don’t want to be treated like I’m in Sunday School. So having to run on the spot or wave my arms during ‘The name of the Lord is a strong tower’ – no thanks. Nor the down to my knees and up in the air during ‘Lord, I lift your name on high’- if I want a Mexican wave, I’ll go to a sporting event. Besides, I’ve heard too many worship leaders play the intro to that song just like Steve Miller’s ‘The Joker’. One day, I’m going to hear someone singing in worship, ‘Some call me the space cowboy’. It might be me.

And please, no having to put my hands together and flap them like a bird during ‘The power of your love’, when it comes to the line about ‘I’ll fly like an eagle’. My five-year-old and three-year-old do this. I’m forty-eight.

Words: Where do I begin? Much as I like Delirious?, I can’t get my head around the imagery at the beginning of ‘I could sing of your love forever’. ‘Over the mountains and the sea, your river runs with love for me’ – just tell me how a river can run over the sea. Can’t say I’ve ever seen it. And I’m no dancer, so ‘Oh, I feel like dancing’ – well, actually, no. God bless you if you do. Just don’t ask me as one friend did once whether the Lord has released me in dance. Sorry, I’m an introvert; I know that’s a sin, and I’m getting help. (Not really.)

Or there’s plain biblical sloppiness. Pride of place goes here to Robin Mark’s ‘Days of Elijah’. ‘These are the days of your servant David, rebuilding a temple of praise’. Well, David may have been ‘the sweet psalmist of Israel’, but God forbade him to build the temple, because he was a man of blood. Solomon got the gig.

Then there are songs where biblical material is taken over without translation to our culture. If we just quote the Authorised Version or an obscure bit of the Old Testament, that will be deep. Step forward that old favourite, ‘Pierce my ear’ (or ‘Lacerate my nose’, as a friend dubbed it).

Plus there are the ones where a little more thought could have been given to their writing. Ishmael had an old song about God giving us various body parts to use for his praise. Nice idea, apart from the thought that we might look like multiple amputees without God’s help, and I just would never have picked ‘Lord you put a tongue in my mouth’ with teenagers.

I write this, aware that it’s all too easy to score points and get some cheap laughs. I also know that just as in any other period of history, we are in an editing process, and not all the drivel will survive. But the phenomenon of nonsense in worship is a serious issue. Why do worship leaders and publishers let this stuff through? Once, I challenged a worship leader about this, and he said, ‘I just choose something because it works.’ Works in what sense? Sounds good, or fits into a ‘set’, like a gig, I’d suggest.

So – I invite you to post comments about the songs you think need more attention or terminal care, and why. But I’d be just as interested to have a conversation about the reasons for this, and how we might respond (apart from not choosing the stuff).

Technorati Tags: , ,

links for 2008-04-02

Dealing With Memories

I spent some of this morning with one of my property
managers, going through some old papers from the church safe and the former
Church Council Secretary. The Church Council had tasked us with sorting out
what we needed to keep, and what should be offered to the county council
archives service. I find this occasional exercise a fascinating one, especially
when looking out for what familiar names were doing in their youth.

However, much of the job involves saying that we do not need
various documents. Among the church magazines, no-longer-needed financial
papers and other items were photographs and documents relating to key stages in
the building and the congregation’s past. In 1986, someone had done some
research, ready for the seventy-fifth anniversary. 1938 was the year that the
church hall had been built, and we found lists of people who had purchased
bricks. In 1963, the church had been rebuilt. We found one of the financial
appeal letters, and a collection of photos, both from the reopening and the
opening of the hall in 1938. We could not keep all these items, but were
conscious of needing to deal with them carefully if unsentimentally.

For these documents are inanimate testimonies to the work of
God in the past, and we are not isolated from what they represent. What we do
today builds on the faithfulness of God in previous generations, and those
generations’ choices to be faithful to the voice of God, insofar as they heard
him. We looked at people in the pictures, and generally didn’t know who any of
them were (apart from deducing the name of one, because she was clearly
performing the reopening ceremony in 1963, and there is a large plaque naming her).
It would have been all too easy to say, ‘We don’t know these people, get rid of
the pictures,’ but they represented key stages in the life of the church. We kept
them.

Not knowing someone can lead to devaluing them. As we looked
at the photos this morning, we had to remember that the people depicted were
made in the image of God, and many (if not all) of them were disciples of
Jesus. Thus, there was a Christian imperative for us to treat these objects
with a particular dignity.

Even the elderly financial documents that we agreed to shred
had to be handled carefully. Some of them detailed the decisions
Christ-followers had made about their missionary giving. Granted, the facts and
figures were no longer needed and we had limited space to play with, but the
books stood for something. Ultimately, though, a list of dates and numbers didn’t
connect us with personalities so much as photographs did.

What I would hate is if everything of value at the church
were reduced to memories with little hope for the future. We can’t discard the
past – a Protestant error much in common with modernity – for we need our links
with the faithful work of God in Christ through all generations. We shouldn’t
give the impression that everything was wrong until we turned up, any more than
we should wallow in a false image of the past when everything was supposedly
wonderful, unlike today. Past, present and future need to be linked dynamically
in corporate discipleship (or social holiness, as Wesley called it).

Technorati Tags:

Fred Peatross Interviews Alan Hirsch …

… here: New Wineskins

And here are a couple of juicy quotes:

an attractional church can work in a Christendom context, but in a missionary context it actually undermines our efforts to reach people meaningfully with the Gospel of Jesus.

You no doubt know that wonderful quote from Antoine de Saint Extupery: “If you want to build a ship, don’t summon people to buy wood, prepare tools, distribute jobs, and organize the work—rather, teach people the yearning for the wide, boundless ocean.”

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑