The Wind And The Trees

In a recent Abductive Columns email entitled ‘eFriends of Abductive Columns (3)’ Fred Peatross interviewed Leonard Sweet. The interview ends with this quote from Sweet:

the fundamental heresy of the modern world is the notion that the trees move the
wind . . . that the most powerful forces in the universe are physical, material,
“solid” forces (as trees) rather than invisible, spiritual resources (as wind).

It’s the wind that moves the trees. The most powerful forces in the universe
are invisible, spiritual, that’s why I call disciples of Jesus
pneumanauts” (sailors of the Spirit: nauts=sailors; pneuma- wind)

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

The Cross Is An Advert

Dudley Wood Methodist Church will have to pay a planning permission fee for erecting a free-standing cross, since it counts as advertising:

BBC NEWS | England | West Midlands | Church is cross over £75 charge

So in what sense is the Cross an advert for the Church and the Gospel? The old Lenny Bruce comment that if Jesus had been born ‘today’, people would not wear crucifixes but jewellery shaped like an electric chair, reminds us of the offensiveness of the Cross. It is the offence of the Cross rather than its attractiveness that is at the heart of the Gospel. We advertise Christ crucified, a stumbling-block and a foolishness to all except those who are being saved. If we’re not advertising the offensive Cross, we’re not proclaiming the Gospel. We need to embrace the offence.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Reopening

At last I can get round to writing up something of our reopening ceremony last Saturday for Broomfield Methodist Church. The one-line summary is that it far exceeded my expectations, I was thrilled, and it has given us a launchpad for where we go from here. For those who want more than one line, here is a little more detail:

We began the afternoon with the choir from Broomfield Primary School. Nineteen youngsters sang their hearts out. None of their songs was religious, which didn’t matter in the slightest, but more than one had obvious biblical resonances. There was one about the tongue that quoted from the Letter Of James. There was another about the need to do all things in love, and it didn’t matter what talents we had if we didn’t show love.

They were followed by our magician, David Gardner. Timing him straight after the children was great for some of them and their parents staying. He seemed particularly good with the youngest children. David stayed for the whole afternoons, making balloon animals. He made a balloon halo for me. I have since lost it – in more senses than one.

The magic show and the choir meant we started to address the demographic problem in the church of missing young families – the first thing we need to build on.

The formal reopening service was a treat, with even seats in the balcony taken up. (Never did our numbers on the day dip below eighty, and we probably had about a hundred and twenty for the service.) The Mayor of Chelmsford, Cllr Duncan Lumley, unveiled a plaque and proved to be a warm and unassuming man both publicly and privately.

Tom Stuckey, The President of the Methodist Conference, preached up a storm on John chapters 2 and 3. He observed that the stories were about transformation. The cleansing of the Temple is a transformation of a building. We may shape buildings, but they shape us. You cannot stop with a building refurbishment. The water into wine miracle during the wedding at Cana is the transformation of a community. The transformation of the building must lead to community transformation. And the story of Nicodemus shows the need for individual transformation by the Gospel. Is Christ at the centre of our lives? Without individual transformation by Christ the rest cannot happen.

Do I hear an Amen?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Reopening

At last I can get round to writing up something of our reopening ceremony last Saturday for Broomfield Methodist Church. The one-line summary is that it far exceeded my expectations, I was thrilled, and it has given us a launchpad for where we go from here. For those who want more than one line, here is a little more detail:

We began the afternoon with the choir from Broomfield Primary School. Nineteen youngsters sang their hearts out. None of their songs was religious, which didn’t matter in the slightest, but more than one had obvious biblical resonances. There was one about the tongue that quoted from the Letter Of James. There was another about the need to do all things in love, and it didn’t matter what talents we had if we didn’t show love.

They were followed by our magician, David Gardner. Timing him straight after the children was great for some of them and their parents staying. He seemed particularly good with the youngest children. David stayed for the whole afternoons, making balloon animals. He made a balloon halo for me. I have since lost it – in more senses than one.

The magic show and the choir meant we started to address the demographic problem in the church of missing young families – the first thing we need to build on.

The formal reopening service was a treat, with even seats in the balcony taken up. (Never did our numbers on the day dip below eighty, and we probably had about a hundred and twenty for the service.) The Mayor of Chelmsford, Cllr Duncan Lumley, unveiled a plaque and proved to be a warm and unassuming man both publicly and privately.

Tom Stuckey, The President of the Methodist Conference, preached up a storm on John chapters 2 and 3. He observed that the stories were about transformation. The cleansing of the Temple is a transformation of a building. We may shape buildings, but they shape us. You cannot stop with a building refurbishment. The water into wine miracle during the wedding at Cana is the transformation of a community. The transformation of the building must lead to community transformation. And the story of Nicodemus shows the need for individual transformation by the Gospel. Is Christ at the centre of our lives? Without individual transformation by Christ the rest cannot happen.

Do I hear an Amen?

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Forgiveness

This is a tragic and heart-wrenching story from yesterday’s Times:

London bombs terror attack The Times and Sunday Times Times Online

The Revd Julie Nicholson lost her daughter Jenny in the 7/7 London bombings last year. She has stood down as a parish priest, because she cannot forgive the suicide bomber who murdered her daughter. One cannot help but respect her integrity and weep for her pain.

There is a companion piece on the site, How They Coped, which appeared as a sidebar in the paper yesterday. Various people who have faced injustice, violence and the loss of a loved one are interviewed on the subject of forgiveness:

Lesley Bilinda, a Christian aid worker whose Rwandan husband was murdered in the 1994 genocide but does not know her murderers, speaks of the difficulty when you do not know who it is you need to forgive. To avoid resentment destroying her, she forgives them in her head since she could not forgive them to their faces.

Lord Tebbit, whose wife Margaret was permanently disabled in the 1984 IRA Brighton bomb, says forgiveness is not meaningful unless the perpetrator shows repentance. If I read him rightly, he does not forgive the bomber, Patrick McGee, because he judges him not to have repented. Christians may well sympathise with Tebbit’s emphasis on repentance but might say that forgiveness still needs to be offered. Where we might agree with him is that the forgiveness does not become effective until it is received by repentance. But that should not stop us offering it and breaking the cycle of hatred. (None of that precludes the proper course of justice.)

Bill Griffiths, an 85-year-old former POW of the Japanese in World War 2, says he will never forgive and he doesn’t speak about it with fellow veterans but then implies a sense of forgiveness by a roundabout route by working for a charity that helps former servicemen. Is he right that this is roundabout forgiveness?

Dr John Sentamu, Archbishop of York, talks about his experiences in Idi Amin’s Uganda. “I am greatly forgiven by a loving God, so when I consider the beating handed out to me by Idi Amin’s murder squad, I have to choose to react in God’s way … I realised that if you do not forgive, your own prayer life is ruined.”

Marina Cantacuzino of The Forgiveness Project says, “Forgiving is not a sign of moral or spiritual superiority but it is a journey, whereas revenge is a cycle.” (I like that: forgiveness isn’t a one-off but a process.) Later she says, “It’s a gift from one person to another, and not something that anyone deserves.” (How true in terms of grace.) Sadly she concludes by saying, “It’s not for everyone, and that has to be respected.”

Colin Parry, whose 12-year-old son Tim was murdered in the 1993 IRA atrocity at Warrington, says, “It’s not that I can’t forgive, it’s that I choose not to.” (Frightening and honest words.) He claims to have avoided the negative emotions by channelling his energies into charity work. Yet the unforgiveness remains. At the same time, I would add, the journey (if I may borrow Marina Cantacuzino’s image) of forgiveness involves what a friend of mine calls befriending our anger, and recognising that it is part of us, not something that came in from outside. There is nothing wrong with a desire for proper justice. But justice and revenge are different.

I hope my little comments are not trite. I have not had a loved one murdered. I hope I never have to face that.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Miroslav Volf, Free Of Charge, chapter 1: God The Giver

Hopefully in the next few days I’ll grab some time to blog about the funeral and the church rededication (see recent posts on both). In the meantime, I hope this post becomes the first of a weekly series, as I’m using Volf’s book as the basis for Lent courses at two churches.

Tonight we discussed chapter 1 at a home group. Two things have stayed with me from my preparation and the discussion.

Firstly, Volf has a section in the chapter where he discusses the way recipients of gifts are under an obligation to respond – both by giving and by demonstrating gratitude. One group member said he was uneasy about applying this directly to God. God is love, and love does not put people under obligation. Love may yearn for a response but it does not require. Comments, anyone?

Secondly, from my own preparation, I loved the way Volf ended the chapter. We respond to God’s giving in four ways. Firstly, faith, which is not something offered as a good work but is empty hands held out to received. Secondly, gratitude, which is receiving God’s good gifts well. Thirdly, we make ourselves available to be used as instruments of his purposes. Fourthly, this becomes reality in terms of divine participation – the indwelling Christ. But our experience of God’s love then flowing through us is not merely in the sacred places where we have come to expect spiritual experiences, it is also in the world. He writes,

We may pray in the eucharistic prayer, “Deliver us from the presumption of comung to this table for solace only and not for strength; for pardon only, and not for renewal.” But if we don’t turn from facing God, so to speak, to fce our neighbors, the flow of God’s gifts will be arrested with us … God’s gifts flow to others above all when the community scatters, having been nourished in God’s presence … [p54]

For me this approach has important echoes of some disparate streams that have influenced my missiological ecclesiology in recent years. First there was the late John Wimber, who stressed how most of Jesus’ signs and wonders didn’t happen in the synagogue but in everyday life. Second there was James Thwaites’ book ‘The Church Beyond The Congregation’ with its stress on the church dispersed as much as the church gathered. Third there is much Emerging Church thinking that purposely reorientates the church as a missiological community. The writings of Fred Peatross and his Abductive Columns email come particularly to mind.

I’m looking forward to the rest of Lent now.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why Do Heathens Make The Best Christian Films?

Just found this article. It has lots of applications for people in all sorts of artistic and cultural fields. It’s not a perfect article (surprise – and read one or two of the comments posted) but it’s outstanding. It emphasises the importance of metaphor (Show, don’t tell) and makes a good case for why film directors with a Catholic background are better suited to movie-making (they understand iconography, whereas evangelical Protestants are so into the ‘word’ that their work risks degenerating into propaganda).

Here’s the link:

Why Do Heathens Make the Best Christian Films?, by Thom Parham

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑