<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chris Moyles And Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/</link>
	<description>Dave Faulkner. Husband. Dad. Methodist minister. Pseudo-geek. Music lover.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 04:13:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Faulkner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 20:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James,

Thank you for your kind offer and for taking the trouble to comment here. God bless you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>Thank you for your kind offer and for taking the trouble to comment here. God bless you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi All, 

I also attend KingsGate Community Church, and have done for several years. The church building is in Peterborough and we have 2 services every sunday (9.15am &amp; 11.30am). We&#039;re really easy to find and I suggest a visit would be an enjoyable experience for anyone reading this. For a little example of community action taking place search on youtube for - KingsGate Hope Garden Project.
If you do choose to visit then ask for me, &quot;tall&quot; James, in our Welcome Area - I&#039;d love to show you around.

Many Blessings.

James.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All, </p>
<p>I also attend KingsGate Community Church, and have done for several years. The church building is in Peterborough and we have 2 services every sunday (9.15am &amp; 11.30am). We&#8217;re really easy to find and I suggest a visit would be an enjoyable experience for anyone reading this. For a little example of community action taking place search on youtube for &#8211; KingsGate Hope Garden Project.<br />
If you do choose to visit then ask for me, &#8220;tall&#8221; James, in our Welcome Area &#8211; I&#8217;d love to show you around.</p>
<p>Many Blessings.</p>
<p>James.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2351</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Faulkner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Owen,

I&#039;m assuming that by Ichthus Bill is referring to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ichthus.org.uk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ichthus Christian Fellowship&lt;/a&gt; group of churches in the UK, many of them in London. The link I just gave you is their own site; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichthus_Christian_Fellowship&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is the Wikipedia article. I hope you find something in one or other of these links. However, the basic theory is that everyone meets weekly in a cell (small group) midweek, and in a congregation on Sunday. At regular intervals, the congregations gather together for a large event called a celebration. Hence cell-congregation-celebration, balancing different group dynamics and strengths and weaknesses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Owen,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m assuming that by Ichthus Bill is referring to the <a href="http://www.ichthus.org.uk/" rel="nofollow">Ichthus Christian Fellowship</a> group of churches in the UK, many of them in London. The link I just gave you is their own site; <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ichthus_Christian_Fellowship" rel="nofollow">this</a> is the Wikipedia article. I hope you find something in one or other of these links. However, the basic theory is that everyone meets weekly in a cell (small group) midweek, and in a congregation on Sunday. At regular intervals, the congregations gather together for a large event called a celebration. Hence cell-congregation-celebration, balancing different group dynamics and strengths and weaknesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Owen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can certainly say I was impressed with Chris Boyle&#039;s reactions to what he saw, and I do think it shows that, at least to some extent, he was &quot;attracted&quot; to what he saw. (p.s. Dave, if you could please throw me a link that describes the &quot;Icthus model&quot;...I&#039;m unfamiliar with that one...)
 I&#039;m rather inclined to agree, with Bill - I&#039;ve experienced a couple of different mega-churches, and personally didn&#039;t really find that &quot;community&quot; or &quot;family&quot; was really something that was actively sought after. Given the posts by Vicky and Carol, I&#039;m in no way ready to declare mega-churches as unproductive, but it still seems to me that it&#039;s more difficult in that setting. 

I guess my main reason for this is simply that it&#039;s a whole lot easier to get lost in such a large group, and that for anyone who is not naturally outgoing, large settings make it a lot harder to find your &quot;small group&quot;. In contrast, when my wife and I first came to our church,  (the very first service),  we were practically &quot;accosted&quot; with loving and caring people, wanting to meet the &quot;new family&quot;....we had invitations to dinner, playdates for our kids, etc....there was a huge sense of welcome from the entire group.

While I enjoy the atmosphere of the large church in the video, I can&#039;t help feeling that it is more like a great Christian music concert....yes, I realize that&#039;s an oversimplification. While I don&#039;t deny that God can and does use this also, I&#039;m just saying that, while it&#039;s attractive at first, the meat and substance of relationships seems harder to get to than in a smaller setting.

Just my humble opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can certainly say I was impressed with Chris Boyle&#8217;s reactions to what he saw, and I do think it shows that, at least to some extent, he was &#8220;attracted&#8221; to what he saw. (p.s. Dave, if you could please throw me a link that describes the &#8220;Icthus model&#8221;&#8230;I&#8217;m unfamiliar with that one&#8230;)<br />
 I&#8217;m rather inclined to agree, with Bill &#8211; I&#8217;ve experienced a couple of different mega-churches, and personally didn&#8217;t really find that &#8220;community&#8221; or &#8220;family&#8221; was really something that was actively sought after. Given the posts by Vicky and Carol, I&#8217;m in no way ready to declare mega-churches as unproductive, but it still seems to me that it&#8217;s more difficult in that setting. </p>
<p>I guess my main reason for this is simply that it&#8217;s a whole lot easier to get lost in such a large group, and that for anyone who is not naturally outgoing, large settings make it a lot harder to find your &#8220;small group&#8221;. In contrast, when my wife and I first came to our church,  (the very first service),  we were practically &#8220;accosted&#8221; with loving and caring people, wanting to meet the &#8220;new family&#8221;&#8230;.we had invitations to dinner, playdates for our kids, etc&#8230;.there was a huge sense of welcome from the entire group.</p>
<p>While I enjoy the atmosphere of the large church in the video, I can&#8217;t help feeling that it is more like a great Christian music concert&#8230;.yes, I realize that&#8217;s an oversimplification. While I don&#8217;t deny that God can and does use this also, I&#8217;m just saying that, while it&#8217;s attractive at first, the meat and substance of relationships seems harder to get to than in a smaller setting.</p>
<p>Just my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Faulkner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PS - the other thing worth teasing out in your comment, Stephen, is your final words about &#039;get[ting] people to come in the first place&#039;. The so-called &#039;missional&#039; approach to church and mission would have a debate with those words. If you mean that new Christians need to be incorporated into a body of disciples, then yes. However, there are serious questions about getting &#039;them&#039; to come to &#039;us&#039; as a missionary strategy. Jesus said in John 20, &#039;As the Father sent me, so I send you,&#039; which means we have to ask, how was Jesus sent? For that we go back to John 1: &#039;The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.&#039; The first move in Christlike mission, then, is about our witness in the world, in the midst of unbelief. A book that takes this to radical conclusions, including starting new churches in the homes of new converts, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://cole-slaw.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Neil Cole&lt;/a&gt;&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Organic-Church-Growing-Happens-Leadership/dp/078798129X&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Organic Church: Growing faith where life happens&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; the other thing worth teasing out in your comment, Stephen, is your final words about &#8216;get[ting] people to come in the first place&#8217;. The so-called &#8216;missional&#8217; approach to church and mission would have a debate with those words. If you mean that new Christians need to be incorporated into a body of disciples, then yes. However, there are serious questions about getting &#8216;them&#8217; to come to &#8216;us&#8217; as a missionary strategy. Jesus said in John 20, &#8216;As the Father sent me, so I send you,&#8217; which means we have to ask, how was Jesus sent? For that we go back to John 1: &#8216;The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.&#8217; The first move in Christlike mission, then, is about our witness in the world, in the midst of unbelief. A book that takes this to radical conclusions, including starting new churches in the homes of new converts, is <a href="http://cole-slaw.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Neil Cole</a>&#8216;s <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Organic-Church-Growing-Happens-Leadership/dp/078798129X" rel="nofollow">Organic Church: Growing faith where life happens</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2339</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Faulkner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen,

Thank you for your comment and welcome here. We may be coming from different places and experiences on this. My nervousness about words like &#039;wrapper&#039; and &#039;packaging&#039; is that some churches have explicitly used commercial tactics in attracting people. Some have even taken to referring to people as &#039;customers&#039;. 

On the other hand, simply couching the Gospel in a way that is understandable within a particular culture is absolutely fine, and there is biblical precedent: &#039;kingdom of God&#039; from Jewish thought, &#039;Jesus is Lord&#039; in contrast to &#039;Caesar is Lord&#039;, &#039;justification&#039; (a Roman legal term), and so on. We have the permanent problem that faces the church of - to adapt the words of Jesus - being &#039;in the culture but not of the culture&#039;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment and welcome here. We may be coming from different places and experiences on this. My nervousness about words like &#8216;wrapper&#8217; and &#8216;packaging&#8217; is that some churches have explicitly used commercial tactics in attracting people. Some have even taken to referring to people as &#8216;customers&#8217;. </p>
<p>On the other hand, simply couching the Gospel in a way that is understandable within a particular culture is absolutely fine, and there is biblical precedent: &#8216;kingdom of God&#8217; from Jewish thought, &#8216;Jesus is Lord&#8217; in contrast to &#8216;Caesar is Lord&#8217;, &#8216;justification&#8217; (a Roman legal term), and so on. We have the permanent problem that faces the church of &#8211; to adapt the words of Jesus &#8211; being &#8216;in the culture but not of the culture&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Worthington</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Worthington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to attempt to answer you question; &quot;is church about the packaging or what&#039;s inside it?&quot;.

Of course, church is about what&#039;s inside. It&#039;s about the love of Jesus Christ, and the salvation he offers us. I&#039;m sure no Christian would dispute this. However, look at the way Jesus taught. He always taught in a way that was relevant to his audience. I would call this &quot;the packaging&quot;. I am of course not wanting church to sound like just another commericial product, but the comparison with the way products are sold is still valid. Very few people continue to buy a product because they liked the packaging but hated what was inside; but it is often the packaging that drew them to the product in the first place. I think this is how church should be; because it doesn&#039;t matter how good what&#039;s inside is if you can&#039;t get people to come in the first place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to attempt to answer you question; &#8220;is church about the packaging or what&#8217;s inside it?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Of course, church is about what&#8217;s inside. It&#8217;s about the love of Jesus Christ, and the salvation he offers us. I&#8217;m sure no Christian would dispute this. However, look at the way Jesus taught. He always taught in a way that was relevant to his audience. I would call this &#8220;the packaging&#8221;. I am of course not wanting church to sound like just another commericial product, but the comparison with the way products are sold is still valid. Very few people continue to buy a product because they liked the packaging but hated what was inside; but it is often the packaging that drew them to the product in the first place. I think this is how church should be; because it doesn&#8217;t matter how good what&#8217;s inside is if you can&#8217;t get people to come in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2287</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Faulkner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve,

Thanks for your comment and welcome here! A couple of quick responses (sorry about that, but I&#039;m typing this in between appointments):

1. It&#039;s just one of those curiosities about the blogosphere that conversations go off in unexpected directions. In literary circles they&#039;d call it reader-response, probably! You had honourable intentions, but it triggered off other thoughts that you couldn&#039;t possibly have anticipated. 

2. I&#039;d be intrigued to hear you more on your metaphor of the &#039;wrapper&#039;. Is church about the packaging or what&#039;s inside it? But I could have misread you there. You&#039;d be very welcome to say more about what you mean.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment and welcome here! A couple of quick responses (sorry about that, but I&#8217;m typing this in between appointments):</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s just one of those curiosities about the blogosphere that conversations go off in unexpected directions. In literary circles they&#8217;d call it reader-response, probably! You had honourable intentions, but it triggered off other thoughts that you couldn&#8217;t possibly have anticipated. </p>
<p>2. I&#8217;d be intrigued to hear you more on your metaphor of the &#8216;wrapper&#8217;. Is church about the packaging or what&#8217;s inside it? But I could have misread you there. You&#8217;d be very welcome to say more about what you mean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I just say we may be in danger of missing the point here.  As the author of the Youtube clip being discussed I have to say when I posted this on Youtube I didn’t expect it to go to 32,000 hits in just 14 days – possibly testimony to Chris’ popularity. But I also think there is a shared interest and genuine surprise that there are a growing number of substantial, contemporary and lively 21st century churches in the UK.

This is because of their relevant and contextualised message of Jesus Christ – a person who just will not be stereotyped and who’s teaching still cuts through the rubbish and hopelessness in today’s society.  The message is the same but the relevancy of it comes through crystal clear to a new generation searching for hope when the &quot;wrapper&quot; is right.  

I was not intending to promote MEGA-Church in the UK but to simply highlight that God is on the move in his country and that this does not have to be viewed as “un-cool” any longer.   Mega church or not!

The apostle Paul did this all the time when he went to a new place.  He contextualised the message.  Our responsibility is to GET THE WRAPPER RIGHT!  Both inside the four walls of our buildings in our corporate church lives  and in our lives.  The result: &quot;joy in the city!!&quot;  Acts 8]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just say we may be in danger of missing the point here.  As the author of the Youtube clip being discussed I have to say when I posted this on Youtube I didn’t expect it to go to 32,000 hits in just 14 days – possibly testimony to Chris’ popularity. But I also think there is a shared interest and genuine surprise that there are a growing number of substantial, contemporary and lively 21st century churches in the UK.</p>
<p>This is because of their relevant and contextualised message of Jesus Christ – a person who just will not be stereotyped and who’s teaching still cuts through the rubbish and hopelessness in today’s society.  The message is the same but the relevancy of it comes through crystal clear to a new generation searching for hope when the &#8220;wrapper&#8221; is right.  </p>
<p>I was not intending to promote MEGA-Church in the UK but to simply highlight that God is on the move in his country and that this does not have to be viewed as “un-cool” any longer.   Mega church or not!</p>
<p>The apostle Paul did this all the time when he went to a new place.  He contextualised the message.  Our responsibility is to GET THE WRAPPER RIGHT!  Both inside the four walls of our buildings in our corporate church lives  and in our lives.  The result: &#8220;joy in the city!!&#8221;  Acts 8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Faulkner</title>
		<link>http://bigcircumstance.com/2009/06/14/chris-moyles-and-church/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Faulkner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bigcircumstance.com/?p=2244#comment-2228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, Vicky, I know you didn&#039;t pick that avatar! They are automatically generated if people don&#039;t have an ID on one of the relevant web services that &lt;a href=&quot;http://wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gravatar.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gravatar&lt;/a&gt; recognises. Apologies if it looks gruesome!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Vicky, I know you didn&#8217;t pick that avatar! They are automatically generated if people don&#8217;t have an ID on one of the relevant web services that <a href="http://wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">WordPress</a> or <a href="http://www.gravatar.com" rel="nofollow">Gravatar</a> recognises. Apologies if it looks gruesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

